Life cycle assessment in recycling systems: trends, challenges, and gaps

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) represents a robust framework for evaluating the environmental performance of recycling systems; however, its application to closed-loop strategies remains methodologically challenging, and standardized guidelines are still scarce. This article presents a systematic review of 196 recent papers (2020–2025) to analyze current methodological trends, identify key analytical choices across all industrial sectors, and provide recommendations for future assessments. The findings highlight a growing research interest, concentrated primarily in EU countries. However, substantial discrepancies emerge in how studies address technical modeling choices. Notably, there is a strong dominance of attributional over consequential approaches, frequent reporting omissions regarding allocation and inventory choices, and a widespread neglect of uncertainty analyses despite their importance in innovative contexts. Furthermore, scenario analyses predominantly compare different recycling pathways while neglecting alternative end-of-life options like incineration or landfilling, and rarely account for recycled material downcycling or technical substitutability. The study concludes that no clear consensus on a unified methodology exists across various industrial sectors. To enhance transparency, comparability, and decision-making utility of LCA in recycling systems, this paper outlines strategic recommendations and emphasizes the urgent need for harmonized, sector-specific guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.102286
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Life cycle assessment in recycling systems: trends, challenges, and gaps

Anna Mazzi, Caterina Barbiero
2 links
Sustainable Futures
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Life cycle assessment in recycling systems: trends, challenges, and gaps

Anna Mazzi, Caterina Barbiero
article en

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) represents a robust framework for evaluating the environmental performance of recycling systems; however, its application to closed-loop strategies remains methodologically challenging, and standardized guidelines are still scarce. This article presents a systematic review of 196 recent papers (2020–2025) to analyze current methodological trends, identify key analytical choices across all industrial sectors, and provide recommendations for future assessments. The findings highlight a growing research interest, concentrated primarily in EU countries. However, substantial discrepancies emerge in how studies address technical modeling choices. Notably, there is a strong dominance of attributional over consequential approaches, frequent reporting omissions regarding allocation and inventory choices, and a widespread neglect of uncertainty analyses despite their importance in innovative contexts. Furthermore, scenario analyses predominantly compare different recycling pathways while neglecting alternative end-of-life options like incineration or landfilling, and rarely account for recycled material downcycling or technical substitutability. The study concludes that no clear consensus on a unified methodology exists across various industrial sectors. To enhance transparency, comparability, and decision-making utility of LCA in recycling systems, this paper outlines strategic recommendations and emphasizes the urgent need for harmonized, sector-specific guidelines.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 12
University of Padua (IT)
European Commission
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon