Feasible closed-loop stimulation for neural latent dynamics control

Modern neuroscience benefits from powerful computational and experimental methods for studying neural populations, including latent dynamics models that predict behavior with few dimensions. But despite their explanatory utility, latent factors are seldom targeted explicitly with experimental perturbations, leaving causal relationships to behavior and inferred dynamical landscapes untested. A promising solution is closed-loop, multi-channel optogenetic control, which, when paired with model predictions, could steer neural trajectories in real time—a feat impossible for traditional, hand-designed stimulation. However, because closed-loop latent control has not been demonstrated in vivo, the hardware and software requirements remain unclear—particularly the necessary stimulation dimensionality and how limited resources such as implant volume and bandwidth should be allocated between stimulation and recording capabilities. Preliminary experiments would thus help guide ongoing technological development. As large-scale exploration of these design spaces in vivo is prohibitively expensive, we conducted a high-throughput simulation survey using biophysically grounded spiking neural networks. We found that low-dimensional actuation is sufficient: in the reference configuration, ~20% of the stimulation channels achieved ~85% of peak control performance, far fewer than the number of neurons. Furthermore, allocating channels roughly equally between stimulation and recording optimized behavioral control, whereas pairing many electrodes with a single light source—the prevailing practice in experimental labs—performed poorly. Even without heavily optimizing modeling or control, we obtained >60% tracking error reduction and >90% evoked behavior accuracy on average for optimal channel counts. These results held across extensive parameter variations, suggesting that closed-loop latent control is feasible with accessible channel counts and establishing design principles for future tool development and in vivo experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.06.762216
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Feasible closed-loop stimulation for neural latent dynamics control

Gordon J Berman, Christopher J. Rozell, Chethan Pandarinath, Kyle A. Johnsen et al.
2 links
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
preprint

Feasible closed-loop stimulation for neural latent dynamics control

Gordon J Berman, Christopher J. Rozell, Chethan Pandarinath, Kyle A. Johnsen, Yijun Lai, Lavan Vivekanandasarma
preprint en

Abstract

Modern neuroscience benefits from powerful computational and experimental methods for studying neural populations, including latent dynamics models that predict behavior with few dimensions. But despite their explanatory utility, latent factors are seldom targeted explicitly with experimental perturbations, leaving causal relationships to behavior and inferred dynamical landscapes untested. A promising solution is closed-loop, multi-channel optogenetic control, which, when paired with model predictions, could steer neural trajectories in real time—a feat impossible for traditional, hand-designed stimulation. However, because closed-loop latent control has not been demonstrated in vivo, the hardware and software requirements remain unclear—particularly the necessary stimulation dimensionality and how limited resources such as implant volume and bandwidth should be allocated between stimulation and recording capabilities. Preliminary experiments would thus help guide ongoing technological development. As large-scale exploration of these design spaces in vivo is prohibitively expensive, we conducted a high-throughput simulation survey using biophysically grounded spiking neural networks. We found that low-dimensional actuation is sufficient: in the reference configuration, ~20% of the stimulation channels achieved ~85% of peak control performance, far fewer than the number of neurons. Furthermore, allocating channels roughly equally between stimulation and recording optimized behavioral control, whereas pairing many electrodes with a single light source—the prevailing practice in experimental labs—performed poorly. Even without heavily optimizing modeling or control, we obtained >60% tracking error reduction and >90% evoked behavior accuracy on average for optimal channel counts. These results held across extensive parameter variations, suggesting that closed-loop latent control is feasible with accessible channel counts and establishing design principles for future tool development and in vivo experiments.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Emory University (US)
Emory University, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon