Fetal Cells in Maternal Blood for Noninvasive Prenatal Testing—Is it Still a Distant Star?

ABSTRACT Accurate and safe prenatal diagnosis of severe genetic disorders remains challenging despite advances in genomic technologies and increased use of cell‐free noninvasive prenatal testing (cfNIPT). Currently, approximately half of pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs) and most monogenic disorders are identified only postnatally. cfNIPT primarily detects aneuploidies. Some extended cfNIPTs perform genome‐wide screening for larger pCNVs as well as selected microdeletion syndromes. Traditional invasive techniques, such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS), detect both aneuploidies and pCNVs but involve a slight risk of miscarriage. Emerging cell‐based noninvasive prenatal testing (cbNIPT) represents a promising advancement, potentially increasing prenatal detection rates by enabling accurate, safe, and comprehensive genome‐wide analysis, including small but clinically significant microdeletions, and monogenic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease. In this review, we make a case for cbNIPT and describe its positioning with respect to cfNIPT. We also present the development of a cell‐based technology from finding fetal cell specific biomarkers, streamlining the technology of isolating cells from maternal blood, generating clinical data, and launching a test in the market. This advancement could substantially enhance informed decision‐making, timely clinical interventions, and pregnancy outcomes as compared to cfNIPT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70304
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Fetal Cells in Maternal Blood for Noninvasive Prenatal Testing—Is it Still a Distant Star?

Mathias Kølvraa, Katarina Ravn, Morten Muhlig Nielsen, Ida Vogel et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Fetal Cells in Maternal Blood for Noninvasive Prenatal Testing—Is it Still a Distant Star?

Mathias Kølvraa, Katarina Ravn, Morten Muhlig Nielsen, Ida Vogel, Ripudaman Singh, Maibritt Nørgaard, Maria Bach Laursen, Marlene Christina Nielsen, Lotte Hatt, Bolette Hestbek Nicolaisen, Line Dahl Jeppesen, Lars Henning Pedersen, Mads Tang Dalsgaard, Britt Kidmose Ardal, Inga Baach Cristensen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate and safe prenatal diagnosis of severe genetic disorders remains challenging despite advances in genomic technologies and increased use of cell‐free noninvasive prenatal testing (cfNIPT). Currently, approximately half of pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs) and most monogenic disorders are identified only postnatally. cfNIPT primarily detects aneuploidies. Some extended cfNIPTs perform genome‐wide screening for larger pCNVs as well as selected microdeletion syndromes. Traditional invasive techniques, such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS), detect both aneuploidies and pCNVs but involve a slight risk of miscarriage. Emerging cell‐based noninvasive prenatal testing (cbNIPT) represents a promising advancement, potentially increasing prenatal detection rates by enabling accurate, safe, and comprehensive genome‐wide analysis, including small but clinically significant microdeletions, and monogenic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease. In this review, we make a case for cbNIPT and describe its positioning with respect to cfNIPT. We also present the development of a cell‐based technology from finding fetal cell specific biomarkers, streamlining the technology of isolating cells from maternal blood, generating clinical data, and launching a test in the market. This advancement could substantially enhance informed decision‐making, timely clinical interventions, and pregnancy outcomes as compared to cfNIPT.

Prenatal Diagnosis
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon