Validation of a large language model–assisted three-layer screening cascade against a completed clinical practice guideline for hip osteoarthritis

ABSTRACT Purpose Clinical practice guideline development requires title and abstract screening of many records. Large language models (LLMs) may reduce the number of records requiring manual screening, but their ability to retain studies identified during full-text assessment remains uncertain. Methods We retrospectively evaluated an LLM-assisted three-layer screening cascade using 904 English-language records from chapter 4 (conservative management) of a completed clinical practice guideline for hip osteoarthritis. The cascade used GPT-4o mini to assess study design, population, and question-specific intervention and outcome criteria. After full-text assessment, the guideline panel selected 64 record-question pairs, which served as the reference standard. Uncertain records were retained for manual review. The full cascade was run independently five times. The primary outcomes were the reduction in records requiring manual screening and sensitivity against the reference standard. Results Across the five runs, a median of 420 of 904 records (46.5%) were automatically excluded from all eight questions, leaving a median of 484 records (53.5%) for review on at least one question. For individual questions, 40–272 records remained for manual screening. The cascade retained 60 of 64 reference standard record-question pairs in each run, yielding a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% confidence interval, 85.0%–97.5%). The four pairs not retained comprised two safety studies, one biomechanical study, and one systematic review mainly addressing knee osteoarthritis. Conclusions In chapter 4 of a completed hip osteoarthritis guideline, an LLM-assisted cascade reduced the number of records requiring manual title and abstract screening while retaining 60 of 64 selected pairs. Its applicability to other chapters and guidelines, and to evidence beyond direct intervention effectiveness studies, remains to be evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Joint Surgery and Research
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjoisr.2026.10.002
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Validation of a large language model–assisted three-layer screening cascade against a completed clinical practice guideline for hip osteoarthritis

Yusuke Osawa, Keiji Otaka, Yasuhiko Takegami, Hiroshi Asai et al.
4 links
Journal of Joint Surgery and Research
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Validation of a large language model–assisted three-layer screening cascade against a completed clinical practice guideline for hip osteoarthritis

Yusuke Osawa, Keiji Otaka, Yasuhiko Takegami, Hiroshi Asai, Hiroto Funahashi, Hiroaki Ido, Hiroyuki Yokoi, Tanaka Shin'ya, Kimihiro Ono
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Clinical practice guideline development requires title and abstract screening of many records. Large language models (LLMs) may reduce the number of records requiring manual screening, but their ability to retain studies identified during full-text assessment remains uncertain. Methods We retrospectively evaluated an LLM-assisted three-layer screening cascade using 904 English-language records from chapter 4 (conservative management) of a completed clinical practice guideline for hip osteoarthritis. The cascade used GPT-4o mini to assess study design, population, and question-specific intervention and outcome criteria. After full-text assessment, the guideline panel selected 64 record-question pairs, which served as the reference standard. Uncertain records were retained for manual review. The full cascade was run independently five times. The primary outcomes were the reduction in records requiring manual screening and sensitivity against the reference standard. Results Across the five runs, a median of 420 of 904 records (46.5%) were automatically excluded from all eight questions, leaving a median of 484 records (53.5%) for review on at least one question. For individual questions, 40–272 records remained for manual screening. The cascade retained 60 of 64 reference standard record-question pairs in each run, yielding a sensitivity of 93.8% (95% confidence interval, 85.0%–97.5%). The four pairs not retained comprised two safety studies, one biomechanical study, and one systematic review mainly addressing knee osteoarthritis. Conclusions In chapter 4 of a completed hip osteoarthritis guideline, an LLM-assisted cascade reduced the number of records requiring manual title and abstract screening while retaining 60 of 64 selected pairs. Its applicability to other chapters and guidelines, and to evidence beyond direct intervention effectiveness studies, remains to be evaluated.

Journal of Joint Surgery and ResearchVol. 4(4)
Nagoya University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon