Genomic comparison of chlorhexidine, fluoride, and probiotic mouthwashes on oral microflora in fixed orthodontic patients

Objectives: To compare the effects of chlorhexidine, fluoride, and probiotic mouthwashes on selected oral microorganisms in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and genome sequencing. Material and Methods: Eighty patients aged 13–29 years undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment were randomly allocated to four groups of 20 each: Chlorhexidine mouthwash, fluoride mouthwash, probiotic mouthwash, and control. Participants in the intervention groups brushed twice daily with fluoridated toothpaste and rinsed twice daily with the assigned mouthwash diluted 1:1 with water for 60 s for 30 days. The control group used toothbrushing and water rinsing only. Plaque samples were collected from the first premolar bracket area after 30 days. Microbial genomic DNA was extracted, and PCR was performed to detect Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus , and porphyromonas gingivalis . One amplified sample per group for each bacterium underwent genome sequencing. Categorical comparisons were analyzed using the Chi-square test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The control group showed the highest prevalence of all three microorganisms. S. mutans positivity was highest in the control group (80%) and lowest in the fluoride group (20%). L. acidophilus positivity was highest in the control group (50%) and lowest in the chlorhexidine group (15%). P. gingivalis positivity was highest in the control group (55%) and lowest in the chlorhexidine group (15%). Intergroup differences were statistically significant for S. mutans and P. gingivalis . Chlorhexidine, fluoride, and probiotic mouthwashes all reduced microbial prevalence compared with the control group. Conclusion: Adjunctive mouthwash use during fixed orthodontic treatment reduced oral microbial prevalence compared with toothbrushing alone. Chlorhexidine showed the greatest reduction in P. gingivalis and L. acidophilus , while fluoride showed the greatest reduction in S. mutans . Probiotic mouthwash demonstrated a moderate antimicrobial effect and may be considered a useful adjunct to routine oral hygiene measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_137_2026
Primary Topic
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Genomic comparison of chlorhexidine, fluoride, and probiotic mouthwashes on oral microflora in fixed orthodontic patients

Kranti Kiran Reddy Ealla, Saritha Madham, Prasad Nalabothu, Abhiram Kante et al.
2 links
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
article

Genomic comparison of chlorhexidine, fluoride, and probiotic mouthwashes on oral microflora in fixed orthodontic patients

Kranti Kiran Reddy Ealla, Saritha Madham, Prasad Nalabothu, Abhiram Kante, A. Lakshmi Prasanna, Kalyani Varshini, Nagarjuna Prasad Kavuda, Suman Hosagara Dathathri
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effects of chlorhexidine, fluoride, and probiotic mouthwashes on selected oral microorganisms in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and genome sequencing. Material and Methods: Eighty patients aged 13–29 years undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment were randomly allocated to four groups of 20 each: Chlorhexidine mouthwash, fluoride mouthwash, probiotic mouthwash, and control. Participants in the intervention groups brushed twice daily with fluoridated toothpaste and rinsed twice daily with the assigned mouthwash diluted 1:1 with water for 60 s for 30 days. The control group used toothbrushing and water rinsing only. Plaque samples were collected from the first premolar bracket area after 30 days. Microbial genomic DNA was extracted, and PCR was performed to detect Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus , and porphyromonas gingivalis . One amplified sample per group for each bacterium underwent genome sequencing. Categorical comparisons were analyzed using the Chi-square test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The control group showed the highest prevalence of all three microorganisms. S. mutans positivity was highest in the control group (80%) and lowest in the fluoride group (20%). L. acidophilus positivity was highest in the control group (50%) and lowest in the chlorhexidine group (15%). P. gingivalis positivity was highest in the control group (55%) and lowest in the chlorhexidine group (15%). Intergroup differences were statistically significant for S. mutans and P. gingivalis . Chlorhexidine, fluoride, and probiotic mouthwashes all reduced microbial prevalence compared with the control group. Conclusion: Adjunctive mouthwash use during fixed orthodontic treatment reduced oral microbial prevalence compared with toothbrushing alone. Chlorhexidine showed the greatest reduction in P. gingivalis and L. acidophilus , while fluoride showed the greatest reduction in S. mutans . Probiotic mouthwash demonstrated a moderate antimicrobial effect and may be considered a useful adjunct to routine oral hygiene measures.

APOS Trends in OrthodonticsVol. 0
Universitäres Zentrum für Zahnmedizin Basel (CH), Malla Reddy Vishwavidyapeeth (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon