Integrating recycled concrete carbonation and calciner electrification for low‐carbon cement: Techno‐economic assessment

Abstract This study evaluates the techno‐economic feasibility of integrating a recycled concrete fines (RCF) wet carbonation process into an electrified‐calciner cement plant focusing on energy consumption, CO 2 avoidance, and cost implications at an industrial scale. The proposed system is compared with a stand‐alone electrified calciner, an electrified‐calciner plant using non‐carbonated RCF directly in the cement blend, and an electrified‐calciner plant equipped with monoethanolamine (MEA)‐based capture. Results show that the RCF carbonation process is energy‐intensive (3.35 MJ el /kg) and provides limited decarbonization compared to MEA capture. Under the European energy mix, the CO 2 avoidance rate reaches 61.7%, only slightly higher than calciner electrification alone and largely driven by clinker substitution rather than by CO 2 uptake during carbonation. Economically, the increased cement production and lower capital expenses associated with carbonation result in a modest improvement in CO 2 avoidance cost (200.7 €/t) compared to the MEA‐based capture option (217.4 €/t).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIChE Journal
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.70752
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Integrating recycled concrete carbonation and calciner electrification for low‐carbon cement: Techno‐economic assessment

George Melitos, Fabrizio Bezzo, Federico d’Amore, Leonardo Varnier
AIChE Journal
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Integrating recycled concrete carbonation and calciner electrification for low‐carbon cement: Techno‐economic assessment

George Melitos, Fabrizio Bezzo, Federico d’Amore, Leonardo Varnier
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the techno‐economic feasibility of integrating a recycled concrete fines (RCF) wet carbonation process into an electrified‐calciner cement plant focusing on energy consumption, CO 2 avoidance, and cost implications at an industrial scale. The proposed system is compared with a stand‐alone electrified calciner, an electrified‐calciner plant using non‐carbonated RCF directly in the cement blend, and an electrified‐calciner plant equipped with monoethanolamine (MEA)‐based capture. Results show that the RCF carbonation process is energy‐intensive (3.35 MJ el /kg) and provides limited decarbonization compared to MEA capture. Under the European energy mix, the CO 2 avoidance rate reaches 61.7%, only slightly higher than calciner electrification alone and largely driven by clinker substitution rather than by CO 2 uptake during carbonation. Economically, the increased cement production and lower capital expenses associated with carbonation result in a modest improvement in CO 2 avoidance cost (200.7 €/t) compared to the MEA‐based capture option (217.4 €/t).

AIChE Journal
University of Padua (IT), National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon