How visitors construct urban attraction systems: spatial and temporal constraints on movement

Urban attractions are often examined as individual sites, although visitors experience cities by selecting, combining and sequencing attractions within geographically structured and temporally finite opportunity sets. This study conceptualises a visitor-created urban attraction system as an emergent relational structure produced through the interaction of visitor agency, attraction compatibility and urban spatial-temporal organisation. Using survey and multi-day itinerary data from 1,341 visitors to Canberra, Australia, the analysis integrates popularity-adjusted co-visitation networks, directed movement sequences, spatial network models and visit-level time-budget models. Results identified 59 stronger-than-expected attraction ties and six stable communities. Only six directed pathways occurred more frequently than expected, showing that trip-level co-visitation and immediate sequential movement constitute distinct relational layers. Thematic similarity, admission compatibility and co-location were associated with broader trip-level combinations, whereas shared precinct, thematic similarity and co-location were more important for immediate movement. Departure time was strongly associated with whether another attraction was visited. Urban attraction systems are therefore neither simple reflections of supply nor products of visitor preference alone; they emerge as visitors coordinate attraction value and compatibility with urban spatial structure, mobility resources and finite time. The study advances a tourism-geographical explanation of layered attraction-system formation within urban opportunity structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tourism Geographies
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2026.2760411
Primary Topic
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

How visitors construct urban attraction systems: spatial and temporal constraints on movement

Bob McKercher, Brent W. Ritchie
Tourism Geographies
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
article

How visitors construct urban attraction systems: spatial and temporal constraints on movement

Bob McKercher, Brent W. Ritchie
article en

Abstract

Urban attractions are often examined as individual sites, although visitors experience cities by selecting, combining and sequencing attractions within geographically structured and temporally finite opportunity sets. This study conceptualises a visitor-created urban attraction system as an emergent relational structure produced through the interaction of visitor agency, attraction compatibility and urban spatial-temporal organisation. Using survey and multi-day itinerary data from 1,341 visitors to Canberra, Australia, the analysis integrates popularity-adjusted co-visitation networks, directed movement sequences, spatial network models and visit-level time-budget models. Results identified 59 stronger-than-expected attraction ties and six stable communities. Only six directed pathways occurred more frequently than expected, showing that trip-level co-visitation and immediate sequential movement constitute distinct relational layers. Thematic similarity, admission compatibility and co-location were associated with broader trip-level combinations, whereas shared precinct, thematic similarity and co-location were more important for immediate movement. Departure time was strongly associated with whether another attraction was visited. Urban attraction systems are therefore neither simple reflections of supply nor products of visitor preference alone; they emerge as visitors coordinate attraction value and compatibility with urban spatial structure, mobility resources and finite time. The study advances a tourism-geographical explanation of layered attraction-system formation within urban opportunity structures.

Tourism Geographies
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), The University of Queensland (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon