Title MindArc Depths 1–2: Enacted Role, Signal Registration, and Response Way

This article sets out in detail the first and second depths of MindArc, the integrative mind architecture. These two depths record what goes out and what impinges in a single episode. The first depth records what was actually done and the consequence that actually occurred (D1 Behavioral Realization); the second records what impinged and the first pull felt toward it (D2 Signal Registration). The model codes a single action with two ways of acting, Directing and Enabling, and codes the consequence with four sides: Task, People, Risk, and Options. Crossing these two dimensions yields eight Enacted Roles (R1). On the cue side, the model codes four cue sources (others, oneself, work, and the situation) paired with three initial charges (inviting, alarming, and neutral), which yields the 12 cells of Signal Pull (R2). The cross-depth resultant is the Response Way (R1–2), which pairs each role with the cue from the source that matches the side of its consequence, giving 24 cells read as: the cue comes first, then the action. The article separates the research that supports each part from what is the model's own design. Research supports the split between the two ways of acting, the split among areas of performance, the separation of cue sources one by one, and the fast good-or-bad evaluation of what comes in, but no study uses the same set of eight roles, 12 cells, or 24 cells as the model. Every value in these two depths is a value of the episode, not a characteristic of the person. The article proposes measurement principles based on real episodes that respondents recall, and five testable hypotheses. The model has not yet been tested empirically. This article is a part article of the MindArc overview article (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23578802). The record holds the article in Thai and English.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24002988
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Title MindArc Depths 1–2: Enacted Role, Signal Registration, and Response Way

Akira Jirakankorn
6 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Behavioral Health and Interventions
preprint

Title MindArc Depths 1–2: Enacted Role, Signal Registration, and Response Way

Akira Jirakankorn
preprint en

Abstract

This article sets out in detail the first and second depths of MindArc, the integrative mind architecture. These two depths record what goes out and what impinges in a single episode. The first depth records what was actually done and the consequence that actually occurred (D1 Behavioral Realization); the second records what impinged and the first pull felt toward it (D2 Signal Registration). The model codes a single action with two ways of acting, Directing and Enabling, and codes the consequence with four sides: Task, People, Risk, and Options. Crossing these two dimensions yields eight Enacted Roles (R1). On the cue side, the model codes four cue sources (others, oneself, work, and the situation) paired with three initial charges (inviting, alarming, and neutral), which yields the 12 cells of Signal Pull (R2). The cross-depth resultant is the Response Way (R1–2), which pairs each role with the cue from the source that matches the side of its consequence, giving 24 cells read as: the cue comes first, then the action. The article separates the research that supports each part from what is the model's own design. Research supports the split between the two ways of acting, the split among areas of performance, the separation of cue sources one by one, and the fast good-or-bad evaluation of what comes in, but no study uses the same set of eight roles, 12 cells, or 24 cells as the model. Every value in these two depths is a value of the episode, not a characteristic of the person. The article proposes measurement principles based on real episodes that respondents recall, and five testable hypotheses. The model has not yet been tested empirically. This article is a part article of the MindArc overview article (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23578802). The record holds the article in Thai and English.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon