Component Ablations in Small Compositional Byte Language Models

Original empirical computational research using local CPU experiments with depth- and parameter-matched controls and individually retuned component ablations for small byte language models. The new extension evaluates twenty architectures with a common four-rate development sweep and five fresh final training seeds on two newly reserved literary books. All final checkpoints and rate choices were frozen before reserved-book scoring. The selected six-component composition obtains 2.656 bits per byte, compared with 2.669 for a simpler depth-matched GRU–MLP reference, 2.735 for a convolution–SwiGLU–attention reference, and 2.948 for the SwiGLU Transformer reference. Adding residual depth increased loss in all three tested reference families under this parameter and update budget. Individual learning-rate selection had mixed held-out effects. Equal residual-block counts and parameters do not establish equal full compute or general architectural superiority. The 28-page v7 manuscript retains earlier experiments as separate historical evidence and keeps all prior 3D plots, with two new views added. The rotatable HTML companion presents the same coordinates. The supplement provides exact local source/configuration files, original literary corpus downloads with their notices, raw fit/score records, seed-level outcomes, a computational evidence audit, and a standard-library aggregation script. Checkpoints are omitted; independent retraining has not been performed. This is an empirical computational research preprint and has not undergone human peer review. Numerical checks and independent visual QA do not establish general architectural superiority, biological validity or clinical benefit.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24044107
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Component Ablations in Small Compositional Byte Language Models

Andrew Friedl
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topic Modeling
preprint

Component Ablations in Small Compositional Byte Language Models

Andrew Friedl
preprint en

Abstract

Original empirical computational research using local CPU experiments with depth- and parameter-matched controls and individually retuned component ablations for small byte language models. The new extension evaluates twenty architectures with a common four-rate development sweep and five fresh final training seeds on two newly reserved literary books. All final checkpoints and rate choices were frozen before reserved-book scoring. The selected six-component composition obtains 2.656 bits per byte, compared with 2.669 for a simpler depth-matched GRU–MLP reference, 2.735 for a convolution–SwiGLU–attention reference, and 2.948 for the SwiGLU Transformer reference. Adding residual depth increased loss in all three tested reference families under this parameter and update budget. Individual learning-rate selection had mixed held-out effects. Equal residual-block counts and parameters do not establish equal full compute or general architectural superiority. The 28-page v7 manuscript retains earlier experiments as separate historical evidence and keeps all prior 3D plots, with two new views added. The rotatable HTML companion presents the same coordinates. The supplement provides exact local source/configuration files, original literary corpus downloads with their notices, raw fit/score records, seed-level outcomes, a computational evidence audit, and a standard-library aggregation script. Checkpoints are omitted; independent retraining has not been performed. This is an empirical computational research preprint and has not undergone human peer review. Numerical checks and independent visual QA do not establish general architectural superiority, biological validity or clinical benefit.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon