Lifestyle Psychiatry in Mental Health Care: Knowledge, Practices and Attitudes of Australian Health Practitioners

This study sought to examine Australian health practitioners' knowledge, practices, and attitudes regarding lifestyle psychiatry to help elucidate factors driving an implementation gap. A convergent parallel mixed methods design was employed using an online survey with closed- and open-ended questions on eight lifestyle interventions. 212 eligible health practitioners working in or referring to mental health settings completed an online survey. Descriptive analyses were used for quantitative data, and conventional content analysis for qualitative data. Results indicated that 73.6% of participants had knowledge of lifestyle psychiatry. Two categories described their understanding of lifestyle psychiatry in mental health care: Lifestyle interventions are non-medical adjuncts that complement current practices; and lifestyle interventions empower behaviour change across a range of domains. Most participants considered all eight lifestyle interventions to be evidence-based. The mean number of lifestyle interventions in which participants had received additional training was 1.65, most commonly in mindfulness and stress reduction. Five categories were constructed from respondents' perceived benefits of lifestyle interventions: psychological health, physical health, self-empowerment, holistic wellbeing, and connection to self, other and the wider context. Perceived risks fell into three categories: psychological distress, physical harm, and social and economic impacts. Incorporation of lifestyle psychiatry into patient care varied across interventions; dietary interventions and smoking cessation had the largest implementation gap. Overall, respondents identified benefits of lifestyle psychiatry for holistic mental health care but limited integration, possibly due to perceived risks and insufficient training. Findings support calls for strengthened professional development and embedded training in lifestyle psychiatry within health degrees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-026-01753-z
Primary Topic
Psychiatric care and mental health services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Lifestyle Psychiatry in Mental Health Care: Knowledge, Practices and Attitudes of Australian Health Practitioners

Melissa O’Shea, Tetyana Rocks, Subhadra Evans, Wolfgang Marx et al.
3 links
Community Mental Health Journal
Psychiatric care and mental health services
article

Lifestyle Psychiatry in Mental Health Care: Knowledge, Practices and Attitudes of Australian Health Practitioners

Melissa O’Shea, Tetyana Rocks, Subhadra Evans, Wolfgang Marx, Megan Turner, Abigail Watson, Michael Fryar
article en

Abstract

This study sought to examine Australian health practitioners' knowledge, practices, and attitudes regarding lifestyle psychiatry to help elucidate factors driving an implementation gap. A convergent parallel mixed methods design was employed using an online survey with closed- and open-ended questions on eight lifestyle interventions. 212 eligible health practitioners working in or referring to mental health settings completed an online survey. Descriptive analyses were used for quantitative data, and conventional content analysis for qualitative data. Results indicated that 73.6% of participants had knowledge of lifestyle psychiatry. Two categories described their understanding of lifestyle psychiatry in mental health care: Lifestyle interventions are non-medical adjuncts that complement current practices; and lifestyle interventions empower behaviour change across a range of domains. Most participants considered all eight lifestyle interventions to be evidence-based. The mean number of lifestyle interventions in which participants had received additional training was 1.65, most commonly in mindfulness and stress reduction. Five categories were constructed from respondents' perceived benefits of lifestyle interventions: psychological health, physical health, self-empowerment, holistic wellbeing, and connection to self, other and the wider context. Perceived risks fell into three categories: psychological distress, physical harm, and social and economic impacts. Incorporation of lifestyle psychiatry into patient care varied across interventions; dietary interventions and smoking cessation had the largest implementation gap. Overall, respondents identified benefits of lifestyle psychiatry for holistic mental health care but limited integration, possibly due to perceived risks and insufficient training. Findings support calls for strengthened professional development and embedded training in lifestyle psychiatry within health degrees.

Community Mental Health Journal
Deakin University (AU)
Deakin University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Psychiatric care and mental health services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon