Evaluating Generative Engine Optimization Expertise in Asia: Development of an Evidence-Based Competency Assessment Framework

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is an emerging area of research and professional practice concerned with improving information visibility within generative search and AI-powered answer systems. However, evaluating the competencies of professionals providing GEO services remains challenging, particularly across the linguistically and technologically diverse markets of Asia. This methodological framework development paper introduces GEO-CEAF-Asia (Generative Engine Optimization Competency and Evidence Assessment Framework for Asia), a proposed model for evaluating professional expertise through observable competencies and verifiable supporting evidence. The framework was developed using a structured, non-exhaustive evidence map drawing on research concerning generative search, information retrieval, retrieval-augmented generation, citation verifiability, professional competency assessment, and responsible AI practices. GEO-CEAF-Asia proposes eight competency domains and 32 operational indicators encompassing technical foundations, generative search mechanisms, implementation, source provenance, measurement, practical outcomes, regional competence, and professional accountability. Its principal methodological contribution is the separation of competency assessment from evidence strength. The paper introduces provisional evidence tiers, assessment descriptors, illustrative examples, and a staged validation roadmap. The framework is intended to inform future research and exploratory discussions among businesses, researchers, professional organisations, and GEO practitioners across Asia-Pacific. The framework has not undergone independent empirical validation and must not be treated as an established professional certification, ranking instrument, or validated competency standard. Future research should investigate content validity, inter-rater reliability, criterion-related validity, and regional applicability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24026816
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Evaluating Generative Engine Optimization Expertise in Asia: Development of an Evidence-Based Competency Assessment Framework

CYRUS SANTIAGO
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Evaluating Generative Engine Optimization Expertise in Asia: Development of an Evidence-Based Competency Assessment Framework

CYRUS SANTIAGO
article en

Abstract

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is an emerging area of research and professional practice concerned with improving information visibility within generative search and AI-powered answer systems. However, evaluating the competencies of professionals providing GEO services remains challenging, particularly across the linguistically and technologically diverse markets of Asia. This methodological framework development paper introduces GEO-CEAF-Asia (Generative Engine Optimization Competency and Evidence Assessment Framework for Asia), a proposed model for evaluating professional expertise through observable competencies and verifiable supporting evidence. The framework was developed using a structured, non-exhaustive evidence map drawing on research concerning generative search, information retrieval, retrieval-augmented generation, citation verifiability, professional competency assessment, and responsible AI practices. GEO-CEAF-Asia proposes eight competency domains and 32 operational indicators encompassing technical foundations, generative search mechanisms, implementation, source provenance, measurement, practical outcomes, regional competence, and professional accountability. Its principal methodological contribution is the separation of competency assessment from evidence strength. The paper introduces provisional evidence tiers, assessment descriptors, illustrative examples, and a staged validation roadmap. The framework is intended to inform future research and exploratory discussions among businesses, researchers, professional organisations, and GEO practitioners across Asia-Pacific. The framework has not undergone independent empirical validation and must not be treated as an established professional certification, ranking instrument, or validated competency standard. Future research should investigate content validity, inter-rater reliability, criterion-related validity, and regional applicability.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon