Immersive virtual reality for classification of complex maxillofacial fractures: effects on accuracy, usability, and cognitive workload in a randomized educational study

Accurate classification of complex maxillofacial fractures requires advanced spatial understanding. Virtual reality (VR) may improve three-dimensional anatomical perception compared with conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging; however, its effectiveness for AO Craniomaxillofacial (AOCMF) fracture classification remains unclear. Of 50 eligible dental residents approached for participation, 46 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a VR group ( n = 23) or a conventional 2D imaging group ( n = 23) in this prospective, parallel-group randomized educational study. Each participant evaluated one anonymized complex maxillofacial fracture case and completed an AOCMF classification. The primary outcome was overall classification accuracy compared with an expert reference standard. Secondary outcomes included evaluation time, usability, and satisfaction assessed using a Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ)-based instrument, and perceived workload assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). All 46 randomized participants completed the study and were included in the analysis. Mean AOCMF classification accuracy was significantly higher in the VR group than in the 2D group (61.93 ± 9.56% vs. 52.52 ± 10.88%; mean difference, 9.42 percentage points; 95% CI 3.33–15.50; p = 0.003). Evaluation time did not differ significantly between groups. CSUQ system usefulness, information quality, interface quality, and overall satisfaction scores were comparable between groups. NASA-TLX scores were significantly higher in the VR group, indicating greater perceived workload ( p = 0.003). VR-based assessment improved AOCMF classification accuracy with no statistically significant difference in evaluation time compared with conventional 2D imaging. Although VR was associated with higher perceived workload, usability and satisfaction were similar between methods. VR may serve as a complementary educational tool for training in the assessment and classification of complex maxillofacial fractures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-05438-x
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Immersive virtual reality for classification of complex maxillofacial fractures: effects on accuracy, usability, and cognitive workload in a randomized educational study

Burcu Gürsoytrak, Suat Aktas, Kamil Nelke, Ömer Uranbey et al.
8 links
European journal of medical research
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Immersive virtual reality for classification of complex maxillofacial fractures: effects on accuracy, usability, and cognitive workload in a randomized educational study

Burcu Gürsoytrak, Suat Aktas, Kamil Nelke, Ömer Uranbey, Hasan Şeker
article en

Abstract

Accurate classification of complex maxillofacial fractures requires advanced spatial understanding. Virtual reality (VR) may improve three-dimensional anatomical perception compared with conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging; however, its effectiveness for AO Craniomaxillofacial (AOCMF) fracture classification remains unclear. Of 50 eligible dental residents approached for participation, 46 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a VR group ( n = 23) or a conventional 2D imaging group ( n = 23) in this prospective, parallel-group randomized educational study. Each participant evaluated one anonymized complex maxillofacial fracture case and completed an AOCMF classification. The primary outcome was overall classification accuracy compared with an expert reference standard. Secondary outcomes included evaluation time, usability, and satisfaction assessed using a Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ)-based instrument, and perceived workload assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). All 46 randomized participants completed the study and were included in the analysis. Mean AOCMF classification accuracy was significantly higher in the VR group than in the 2D group (61.93 ± 9.56% vs. 52.52 ± 10.88%; mean difference, 9.42 percentage points; 95% CI 3.33–15.50; p = 0.003). Evaluation time did not differ significantly between groups. CSUQ system usefulness, information quality, interface quality, and overall satisfaction scores were comparable between groups. NASA-TLX scores were significantly higher in the VR group, indicating greater perceived workload ( p = 0.003). VR-based assessment improved AOCMF classification accuracy with no statistically significant difference in evaluation time compared with conventional 2D imaging. Although VR was associated with higher perceived workload, usability and satisfaction were similar between methods. VR may serve as a complementary educational tool for training in the assessment and classification of complex maxillofacial fractures.

European journal of medical research
Adnan Menderes University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon