Comparing the effectiveness of injectable ivermectin in combination with oral fenbendazole to injectable ivermectin with oral levamisole at reducing strongyle-type fecal egg count in weaned beef calves

The objectives of this study were 1) evaluate combination anthelmintic therapy effect on average daily gain (ADG) in weaned beef calves on pasture, and 2) determine if injectable ivermectin + oral levamisole was noninferior to injectable iver­mectin + oral fenbendazole at reducing strongyle-type fecal egg count (FEC). This study was performed in two phases using weaning-age commercial beef calves housed on pasture. Phase 1 included 74 beef calves weaned in March 2025, while phase 2 included 103 calves weaned in September 2025. In each phase, calves were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups based on age, body weight, and FEC at weaning (day 0). Treatment groups in­cluded injectable ivermectin (A), injectable ivermectin + oral levamisole (AP), injectable ivermectin + oral fenbendazole (AS), and no treatment (NO). On day 14 following weaning, calf body weight and FEC were collected, ADG was analyzed using linear mixed models, and non-inferiority analysis was performed us­ing a one-tailed, two-sample t-test. In phase 1, no treatment achieved the target 99% FEC reduction, with combination treat­ments AP and AS achieving mean FEC reductions of 89.8% (90% C.I. 84.5-95.2%) and 77.1% (90% C.I. 65.6-88.6%), respectively, indicating the presence of multiclass anthelmintic resistance. In phase 2, treatments AP and AS achieved mean FEC reduc­tions of 95.4% (90% C.I. 91.7-99%) and 95.9% (90% C.I. 92.8-99%), respectively. In phase 2, AP was noninferior to AS (P = 0.0264). Evidence of ivermectin resistance was present in both phases, with multiclass anthelmintic resistance apparent in phase 1.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Bovine Practitioner
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21423/bpj20279520
Primary Topic
Helminth infection and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Comparing the effectiveness of injectable ivermectin in combination with oral fenbendazole to injectable ivermectin with oral levamisole at reducing strongyle-type fecal egg count in weaned beef calves

Curt Lacy, William Isaac Jumper, Kelsey Margaret Harvey, Joe Dedrickson et al.
The Bovine Practitioner
Helminth infection and control
article

Comparing the effectiveness of injectable ivermectin in combination with oral fenbendazole to injectable ivermectin with oral levamisole at reducing strongyle-type fecal egg count in weaned beef calves

Curt Lacy, William Isaac Jumper, Kelsey Margaret Harvey, Joe Dedrickson, Madeline G. McKnight, Brooklyn L Laubinger, Anna Beth McGehee
article en

Abstract

The objectives of this study were 1) evaluate combination anthelmintic therapy effect on average daily gain (ADG) in weaned beef calves on pasture, and 2) determine if injectable ivermectin + oral levamisole was noninferior to injectable iver­mectin + oral fenbendazole at reducing strongyle-type fecal egg count (FEC). This study was performed in two phases using weaning-age commercial beef calves housed on pasture. Phase 1 included 74 beef calves weaned in March 2025, while phase 2 included 103 calves weaned in September 2025. In each phase, calves were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups based on age, body weight, and FEC at weaning (day 0). Treatment groups in­cluded injectable ivermectin (A), injectable ivermectin + oral levamisole (AP), injectable ivermectin + oral fenbendazole (AS), and no treatment (NO). On day 14 following weaning, calf body weight and FEC were collected, ADG was analyzed using linear mixed models, and non-inferiority analysis was performed us­ing a one-tailed, two-sample t-test. In phase 1, no treatment achieved the target 99% FEC reduction, with combination treat­ments AP and AS achieving mean FEC reductions of 89.8% (90% C.I. 84.5-95.2%) and 77.1% (90% C.I. 65.6-88.6%), respectively, indicating the presence of multiclass anthelmintic resistance. In phase 2, treatments AP and AS achieved mean FEC reduc­tions of 95.4% (90% C.I. 91.7-99%) and 95.9% (90% C.I. 92.8-99%), respectively. In phase 2, AP was noninferior to AS (P = 0.0264). Evidence of ivermectin resistance was present in both phases, with multiclass anthelmintic resistance apparent in phase 1.

The Bovine PractitionerVol. 61(1)
Mississippi State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Helminth infection and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon