PREHOSPITAL RECOGNITION OF STROKE: PERFORMANCE OF FAST AND BE-FAST SCALES AND IMPACT ON ACCESS TO REPERFUSION

Objective: to analyze the performance of FAST and BE-FAST scales in prehospital stroke recognition and their repercussions on access to reperfusion therapy. Method: an integrative review was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, SciELO and the Virtual Health Library, including studies published from 2021 to July 2026. Results: twenty-eight studies were synthesized. FAST showed high operational feasibility but lower sensitivity for posterior circulation events and mild deficits. BE-FAST expanded the detection of balance and visual abnormalities, potentially reducing false negatives, although with lower specificity. Clinical benefit depended on combining the scale with clinical reasoning, last-known-well documentation, capillary glucose testing, prenotification and transport to the appropriate stroke center. Conclusion: BE-FAST can complement FAST but does not replace structured neurological assessment, continuing education and regional management of the stroke pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Society
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51249/hs.v6i05.3306
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

PREHOSPITAL RECOGNITION OF STROKE: PERFORMANCE OF FAST AND BE-FAST SCALES AND IMPACT ON ACCESS TO REPERFUSION

Fábio Caxico de Abreu Júnior
2 links
Health and Society
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

PREHOSPITAL RECOGNITION OF STROKE: PERFORMANCE OF FAST AND BE-FAST SCALES AND IMPACT ON ACCESS TO REPERFUSION

Fábio Caxico de Abreu Júnior
article en

Abstract

Objective: to analyze the performance of FAST and BE-FAST scales in prehospital stroke recognition and their repercussions on access to reperfusion therapy. Method: an integrative review was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, SciELO and the Virtual Health Library, including studies published from 2021 to July 2026. Results: twenty-eight studies were synthesized. FAST showed high operational feasibility but lower sensitivity for posterior circulation events and mild deficits. BE-FAST expanded the detection of balance and visual abnormalities, potentially reducing false negatives, although with lower specificity. Clinical benefit depended on combining the scale with clinical reasoning, last-known-well documentation, capillary glucose testing, prenotification and transport to the appropriate stroke center. Conclusion: BE-FAST can complement FAST but does not replace structured neurological assessment, continuing education and regional management of the stroke pathway.

Health and SocietyVol. 6(05)
Ivy Enber Christian University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon