Biomaterials in 3D bioprinting: Design strategies, material-technique interactions, and biomedical applications

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a transformative approach in biomedical engineering, enabling the fabrication of complex, patient-specific constructs through layer-by-layer deposition of biomaterials and living cells. This review critically synthesizes the role of biomaterials in 3D bioprinting by comparing how material properties, fabrication techniques, and biological requirements interact to determine construct performance across different biomedical applications. Unlike many existing reviews that discuss materials, techniques, and applications separately, this review focuses on the coupled interactions between biomaterial chemistry, fabrication methods, and application-specific requirements across multiple tissue systems. Across these applications, no single biomaterial satisfies all design requirements, leading to compromises between mechanical strength, printability, and biological performance. Hard tissue applications prioritize thermoplastic polymers and ceramics for structural integrity, while soft tissue engineering relies on hydrogel-based bioinks. Printing techniques such as extrusion, inkjet, and stereolithography impose constraints related to resolution, viscosity, and cell viability, driving the use of composite biomaterials and hybrid fabrication strategies. Despite significant advances, major challenges remain, including mechanical mismatch, limited vascularization, reproducibility, and lack of long-term in vivo validation. This review highlights 4D printing, smart biomaterials, and artificial intelligence-assisted design as emerging strategies to advance clinically translatable constructs. Taken together, successful bioprinting is governed by coupled biomaterial-technique interactions within specific clinical contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Materials
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2026.103949
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Biomaterials in 3D bioprinting: Design strategies, material-technique interactions, and biomedical applications

Basel A. Khader, Maha Abumousa, Ghaida Harb, Monther Al-Khateeb
3 links
Next Materials
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Biomaterials in 3D bioprinting: Design strategies, material-technique interactions, and biomedical applications

Basel A. Khader, Maha Abumousa, Ghaida Harb, Monther Al-Khateeb
article en

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a transformative approach in biomedical engineering, enabling the fabrication of complex, patient-specific constructs through layer-by-layer deposition of biomaterials and living cells. This review critically synthesizes the role of biomaterials in 3D bioprinting by comparing how material properties, fabrication techniques, and biological requirements interact to determine construct performance across different biomedical applications. Unlike many existing reviews that discuss materials, techniques, and applications separately, this review focuses on the coupled interactions between biomaterial chemistry, fabrication methods, and application-specific requirements across multiple tissue systems. Across these applications, no single biomaterial satisfies all design requirements, leading to compromises between mechanical strength, printability, and biological performance. Hard tissue applications prioritize thermoplastic polymers and ceramics for structural integrity, while soft tissue engineering relies on hydrogel-based bioinks. Printing techniques such as extrusion, inkjet, and stereolithography impose constraints related to resolution, viscosity, and cell viability, driving the use of composite biomaterials and hybrid fabrication strategies. Despite significant advances, major challenges remain, including mechanical mismatch, limited vascularization, reproducibility, and lack of long-term in vivo validation. This review highlights 4D printing, smart biomaterials, and artificial intelligence-assisted design as emerging strategies to advance clinically translatable constructs. Taken together, successful bioprinting is governed by coupled biomaterial-technique interactions within specific clinical contexts.

Next MaterialsVol. 14
American University of Sharjah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon