Advocacy, Policy, and Community Engagement in the Age of AI

The rapid adoption of generative AI across organizations and society has outpaced the frameworks available to manage it. This chapter argues that existing change management theories, from Lewin's planned model through the emergent approaches of Kanter and Kotter, and even the more human-centered work of Armenakis and Harris, were not built for the unique disruption posed by large language models. Equally, dominant ethical frameworks grounded in deontological and utilitarian thinking have proven insufficient for the relational and contested ques-tions generative AI raises. Together, these gaps call for something different: a model that leads not with process or compliance, but with care. We propose the Care-First Change Framework, grounded in the Ethics of Care (Gilli-gan, 1977; Noddings, 1988; Tronto, 1993) and organized through a Freirean reflection-action cycle (Freire, 2001). Its four components, Modeling, Dialogue, Practice, and Co-Creation, offer a relational, iterative process by which any member of a community or organization, not just those in formal leadership roles, can navigate its relation-ship with generative AI and work toward agreements they believe in. We develop the framework through the prism of P-20 education, where these tensions are especially visible, while showing that the approach extends to advocacy, policy, and community engagement across other institutional and societal contexts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EdArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/asbh9_v1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Advocacy, Policy, and Community Engagement in the Age of AI

John B. Nash, Jason Johnston
EdArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Advocacy, Policy, and Community Engagement in the Age of AI

John B. Nash, Jason Johnston
preprint en

Abstract

The rapid adoption of generative AI across organizations and society has outpaced the frameworks available to manage it. This chapter argues that existing change management theories, from Lewin's planned model through the emergent approaches of Kanter and Kotter, and even the more human-centered work of Armenakis and Harris, were not built for the unique disruption posed by large language models. Equally, dominant ethical frameworks grounded in deontological and utilitarian thinking have proven insufficient for the relational and contested ques-tions generative AI raises. Together, these gaps call for something different: a model that leads not with process or compliance, but with care. We propose the Care-First Change Framework, grounded in the Ethics of Care (Gilli-gan, 1977; Noddings, 1988; Tronto, 1993) and organized through a Freirean reflection-action cycle (Freire, 2001). Its four components, Modeling, Dialogue, Practice, and Co-Creation, offer a relational, iterative process by which any member of a community or organization, not just those in formal leadership roles, can navigate its relation-ship with generative AI and work toward agreements they believe in. We develop the framework through the prism of P-20 education, where these tensions are especially visible, while showing that the approach extends to advocacy, policy, and community engagement across other institutional and societal contexts.

EdArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon