Reciprocity, common pool resource management, and the social organization of labor in swidden agriculture

Agricultural labor exchange, in which farmers form cooperative groups to assist one another with seasonal tasks, is a well studied form of cooperation. However, its role in managing common pool resources (CPRs) has received less attention. We examine how land use decisions and group affiliations structure labor exchange in a swidden agricultural forest commons. Using a Bayesian latent network model, we estimate how kinship, shared church affiliation, village of residence, and the use of communal forest for cattle pasture shape reported labor ties among farmers. Our results show that while labor exchange networks are strongly organized around kin, church, and village affiliations, farmers who use communal forest for cattle pasture are named less frequently as preferred labor partners. We discuss whether this pattern reflects a process of social sanctioning and propose that labor exchange may act as a decentralized governance mechanism for managing CPRs in swidden landscapes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/7w3vh_v1
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Reciprocity, common pool resource management, and the social organization of labor in swidden agriculture

Shane A. Scaggs, Sean S. Downey
SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Land Rights and Reforms
preprint

Reciprocity, common pool resource management, and the social organization of labor in swidden agriculture

Shane A. Scaggs, Sean S. Downey
preprint en

Abstract

Agricultural labor exchange, in which farmers form cooperative groups to assist one another with seasonal tasks, is a well studied form of cooperation. However, its role in managing common pool resources (CPRs) has received less attention. We examine how land use decisions and group affiliations structure labor exchange in a swidden agricultural forest commons. Using a Bayesian latent network model, we estimate how kinship, shared church affiliation, village of residence, and the use of communal forest for cattle pasture shape reported labor ties among farmers. Our results show that while labor exchange networks are strongly organized around kin, church, and village affiliations, farmers who use communal forest for cattle pasture are named less frequently as preferred labor partners. We discuss whether this pattern reflects a process of social sanctioning and propose that labor exchange may act as a decentralized governance mechanism for managing CPRs in swidden landscapes.

SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Decent work and economic growth, Life on land
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Reciprocity, common pool resource management, and the social organization of labor in swidden agriculture — Shane A. Scaggs, Sean S. Downey · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS