Pelacarsen and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with High Lipoprotein(a)

BackgroundPelacarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide, reduces serum levels of lipoprotein(a). However, the effect of pelacarsen on cardiovascular outcomes remains uncertain. MethodsWe conducted an international, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and a lipoprotein(a) level of at least 70 mg per deciliter. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous pelacarsen (80 mg) administered monthly or matching placebo. The primary end point was a major adverse cardiovascular event, defined as a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or urgent coronary revascularization. ResultsA total of 8350 patients underwent randomization, with 8322 included in the efficacy analysis; 4157 patients were assigned to receive pelacarsen, and 4165 to receive placebo. The mean age of the patients was 59.7 years, and 27.0% were women. The median lipoprotein(a) level at baseline was 236 nmol per liter. At 12 months, the lipoprotein(a) level was 64.4 nmol per liter in the pelacarsen group and 233.4 nmol per liter in the placebo group. The median follow-up was 4.7 years. A primary end-point event occurred in 511 patients (12.3%) in the pelacarsen group and in 503 (12.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.15, P=0.76). Among patients with a baseline lipoprotein(a) level of at least 90 mg per deciliter, a primary end-point event occurred in 402 of 3266 patients (12.3%) in the pelacarsen group and in 403 of 3274 (12.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.15; P=0.99). Serious adverse events occurred in 1553 of 4166 patients (37.3%) who received pelacarsen and in 1709 of 4154 (41.1%) who received placebo. ConclusionsPelacarsen did not result in a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than placebo at a median follow-up of 4.7 years. (Funded by Novartis; Lp[a]HORIZON ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04023552.)See also in NEJM Evidence: Extended Analyses of Pelacarsen and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with High Lipoprotein(a)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2610159
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Pelacarsen and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with High Lipoprotein(a)

Abraham Michael Lincoff, Eran Leitersdorf, Michael Joseph Blaha, Ryuichi Morishita et al.
5 links
New England Journal of Medicine
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Pelacarsen and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with High Lipoprotein(a)

Abraham Michael Lincoff, Eran Leitersdorf, Michael Joseph Blaha, Ryuichi Morishita, Steven E. Nissen, Seth Frndak, Leslie Cho, Raul Dias Santos, Venu Menon, Anastasia Lesogor, Ioanna Gouni‐Berthold, Kathy Wolski, Ulf Landmesser, Sotirios Tsimikas, Ziqiang Zhao, Stephen J Nicholls, Brian Manning, Jing Wang, Børge Grønne Nordestgaard, Jackie McCluskey, Hui Cao
article en

Abstract

BackgroundPelacarsen, an antisense oligonucleotide, reduces serum levels of lipoprotein(a). However, the effect of pelacarsen on cardiovascular outcomes remains uncertain. MethodsWe conducted an international, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and a lipoprotein(a) level of at least 70 mg per deciliter. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous pelacarsen (80 mg) administered monthly or matching placebo. The primary end point was a major adverse cardiovascular event, defined as a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or urgent coronary revascularization. ResultsA total of 8350 patients underwent randomization, with 8322 included in the efficacy analysis; 4157 patients were assigned to receive pelacarsen, and 4165 to receive placebo. The mean age of the patients was 59.7 years, and 27.0% were women. The median lipoprotein(a) level at baseline was 236 nmol per liter. At 12 months, the lipoprotein(a) level was 64.4 nmol per liter in the pelacarsen group and 233.4 nmol per liter in the placebo group. The median follow-up was 4.7 years. A primary end-point event occurred in 511 patients (12.3%) in the pelacarsen group and in 503 (12.1%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.15, P=0.76). Among patients with a baseline lipoprotein(a) level of at least 90 mg per deciliter, a primary end-point event occurred in 402 of 3266 patients (12.3%) in the pelacarsen group and in 403 of 3274 (12.3%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.15; P=0.99). Serious adverse events occurred in 1553 of 4166 patients (37.3%) who received pelacarsen and in 1709 of 4154 (41.1%) who received placebo. ConclusionsPelacarsen did not result in a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than placebo at a median follow-up of 4.7 years. (Funded by Novartis; Lp[a]HORIZON ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04023552.)See also in NEJM Evidence: Extended Analyses of Pelacarsen and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with High Lipoprotein(a)

New England Journal of Medicine
University of Copenhagen (DK), Cleveland Clinic (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Cologne (DE), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR), Herlev Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), University of California San Diego (US), Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US), Center of Medical Innovation and Translational Research, The University of Osaka (JP), Monash University (AU), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), The University of Osaka (JP)
Novartis
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon