wsf-policy-brief-2026-002-before_the_warning

Published by the World Sustainability Forum in October 2026, this co-authored policy brief examines how institutions can recognise emerging risks when indicators and classifications no longer capture changing interactions among technological, economic, ecological and social processes. It proposes morphological sensing as an institutional capacity that investigates anomalous evidence without automatically converting novelty into a prediction or warning. The authors explain how machine learning, change-point detection, graph analysis and language systems can assist inquiry while remaining subject to independent verification, human judgement and alternative interpretations. They identify five evaluative tests covering unfamiliar evidence, independent validation, competing representations, revisable categories and institutional responsiveness. Drawing on United Nations AI-governance initiatives, the brief recommends a limited comparative pilot to assess whether these practices improve anticipatory analysis without weakening accountability, human rights or public oversight.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24041394
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

wsf-policy-brief-2026-002-before_the_warning

Jeff M.G. Stokes, KM Stokes
5 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

wsf-policy-brief-2026-002-before_the_warning

Jeff M.G. Stokes, KM Stokes
article en

Abstract

Published by the World Sustainability Forum in October 2026, this co-authored policy brief examines how institutions can recognise emerging risks when indicators and classifications no longer capture changing interactions among technological, economic, ecological and social processes. It proposes morphological sensing as an institutional capacity that investigates anomalous evidence without automatically converting novelty into a prediction or warning. The authors explain how machine learning, change-point detection, graph analysis and language systems can assist inquiry while remaining subject to independent verification, human judgement and alternative interpretations. They identify five evaluative tests covering unfamiliar evidence, independent validation, competing representations, revisable categories and institutional responsiveness. Drawing on United Nations AI-governance initiatives, the brief recommends a limited comparative pilot to assess whether these practices improve anticipatory analysis without weakening accountability, human rights or public oversight.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon