Clinical Outcome Assessments in Movement Disorders: A Scoping Review of Current Rating Scales and Future Needs Beyond Parkinson's Disease

Abstract Background Clinical outcome assessments (COA) are essential for evaluating symptom severity, treatment response, and disease progression in movement disorders. As clinical knowledge evolves, it is necessary to ensure COAs continued relevance and validity. Objectives The aims were to provide an updated overview of existing Movement Disorder Society (MDS)–recommended COAs in movement disorders and to identify specific constructs or COAs requiring further revision or validation to inform current clinical practice and research. Methods The Scientific Evaluation Committee of the MDS‐COA program commissioned a position paper on the current evidentiary state of COAs. A panel of experts conducted a 2‐step review: first, extracting data from previous MDS publications on COA appraisals using a standardized template; second, conducting a scoping review up to May 2026 to identify new COAs or updated validation data in movement disorders. All study designs were considered. Results Of the 13 constructs identified in movement disorders other than PD, updated reviews are most urgently warranted for tremor and dystonia, given the volume of new evidence, emergence of novel instruments, and expanding therapeutic options. For all remaining constructs, important advances were identified alongside persistent gaps in validation, longitudinal data, and clinical interpretability. Conclusions The principal challenge in movement‐disorder outcome assessment has shifted from developing new instruments to establishing their comparative validity, responsiveness, and clinical interpretability. Tremor and dystonia have accumulated sufficient new evidence to justify updated MDS reviews, whereas across all constructs the major unmet needs are harmonization of existing measures, longitudinal validation, and integration of patient‐reported and digital outcomes into clinically meaningful assessment frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70890
Primary Topic
Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Clinical Outcome Assessments in Movement Disorders: A Scoping Review of Current Rating Scales and Future Needs Beyond Parkinson's Disease

Roongroj Bhidayasiri, Kigocha Okeng’o, Nirosen Vijiaratnam, Michelle Hyczy de Siqueira Tosin et al.
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
article

Clinical Outcome Assessments in Movement Disorders: A Scoping Review of Current Rating Scales and Future Needs Beyond Parkinson's Disease

Roongroj Bhidayasiri, Kigocha Okeng’o, Nirosen Vijiaratnam, Michelle Hyczy de Siqueira Tosin, Camila Aquino, Alberto Javier Espay, Tiago Mestre, Panagiota Tsitsi, Álvaro Sánchez‐Ferro, Ioanna Markaki, Aparna Wagle Shukla, Stephen R. Duma, Matěj Škorvánek, Norbert Kovacs, Evita Papathoma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical outcome assessments (COA) are essential for evaluating symptom severity, treatment response, and disease progression in movement disorders. As clinical knowledge evolves, it is necessary to ensure COAs continued relevance and validity. Objectives The aims were to provide an updated overview of existing Movement Disorder Society (MDS)–recommended COAs in movement disorders and to identify specific constructs or COAs requiring further revision or validation to inform current clinical practice and research. Methods The Scientific Evaluation Committee of the MDS‐COA program commissioned a position paper on the current evidentiary state of COAs. A panel of experts conducted a 2‐step review: first, extracting data from previous MDS publications on COA appraisals using a standardized template; second, conducting a scoping review up to May 2026 to identify new COAs or updated validation data in movement disorders. All study designs were considered. Results Of the 13 constructs identified in movement disorders other than PD, updated reviews are most urgently warranted for tremor and dystonia, given the volume of new evidence, emergence of novel instruments, and expanding therapeutic options. For all remaining constructs, important advances were identified alongside persistent gaps in validation, longitudinal data, and clinical interpretability. Conclusions The principal challenge in movement‐disorder outcome assessment has shifted from developing new instruments to establishing their comparative validity, responsiveness, and clinical interpretability. Tremor and dystonia have accumulated sufficient new evidence to justify updated MDS reviews, whereas across all constructs the major unmet needs are harmonization of existing measures, longitudinal validation, and integration of patient‐reported and digital outcomes into clinically meaningful assessment frameworks.

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Rush University Medical Center (US), Thai Red Cross Society (TH), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), University of Ottawa (CA), Chulalongkorn University (TH), University of Calgary (CA), University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik (SK), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH), Karolinska Institutet (SE), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Florida (US), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital (BE), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Univerzitná Nemocnica Louisa Pasteura (SK), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Monash Health (AU), St George Hospital (AU), Muhimbili National Hospital (TZ), Kingston Centre (AU), Office of the Royal Society (TH), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), uOttawa Brain and Mind Research Institute (CA), Hotchkiss Brain Institute (CA), University of Cincinnati (US), University of Pecs (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon