Citizen science complements functional, taxonomic and spatial coverage of bird collections in the Pantanal, the world's largest tropical wetland

Species occurrence data are essential for understanding biodiversity patterns; however, the necessary fieldwork to generate them demands substantial resources and time. Citizen science programmes, such as birdwatching initiatives, can complement traditional sampling by expanding data collection. The Pantanal, one of the world's largest wetlands, hosts the highest avian diversity among such ecosystems and attracts intensive visitation by birdwatchers. However, scientific sampling in the region remains limited, leading to knowledge gaps. We analysed bird records from biological collections ( n = 5050) and citizen science observations ( n = 16 189) to examine the complementarity in taxonomic and functional diversity, as well as spatial and temporal coverage. The two datasets shared 318 species. Biological collections documented 62 exclusive species, whereas citizen science recorded 47 species found only in that source. Citizen science records captured a wider range of species traits but exhibited a slightly narrower distribution of traits than biological collections. Although both datasets occupy much of the same functional space, they remain complementary because each includes species with distinct traits. Records from both datasets concentrate in the northern Pantanal but show distinct spatial patterns. Citizen science provides approximately 2.4 times the spatial coverage of biological collections, with little spatial overlap between records from the two sources. However, the central and most of the boundary regions remain under‐sampled by either dataset. Both datasets negatively correlate with monthly flooded area extent, reflecting limited knowledge of avian diversity during flooding, when up to 80% of the Pantanal is submerged. Our results highlight that citizen science and biological collections can complement each other in capturing bird distribution, diversity and functional traits, which ultimately underpin ecosystem services at regional scales. Expanding similar integrative assessments across different ecoregions will improve biodiversity monitoring, refine conservation strategies and strengthen the value of citizen‐generated information in global ecological research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ibis
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.70157
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Citizen science complements functional, taxonomic and spatial coverage of bird collections in the Pantanal, the world's largest tropical wetland

Thais B. Zanata, Vítor de Queiroz Piacentini, Leda A. P. Stefan
3 links
Ibis
Avian ecology and behavior
article

Citizen science complements functional, taxonomic and spatial coverage of bird collections in the Pantanal, the world's largest tropical wetland

Thais B. Zanata, Vítor de Queiroz Piacentini, Leda A. P. Stefan
article en

Abstract

Species occurrence data are essential for understanding biodiversity patterns; however, the necessary fieldwork to generate them demands substantial resources and time. Citizen science programmes, such as birdwatching initiatives, can complement traditional sampling by expanding data collection. The Pantanal, one of the world's largest wetlands, hosts the highest avian diversity among such ecosystems and attracts intensive visitation by birdwatchers. However, scientific sampling in the region remains limited, leading to knowledge gaps. We analysed bird records from biological collections ( n = 5050) and citizen science observations ( n = 16 189) to examine the complementarity in taxonomic and functional diversity, as well as spatial and temporal coverage. The two datasets shared 318 species. Biological collections documented 62 exclusive species, whereas citizen science recorded 47 species found only in that source. Citizen science records captured a wider range of species traits but exhibited a slightly narrower distribution of traits than biological collections. Although both datasets occupy much of the same functional space, they remain complementary because each includes species with distinct traits. Records from both datasets concentrate in the northern Pantanal but show distinct spatial patterns. Citizen science provides approximately 2.4 times the spatial coverage of biological collections, with little spatial overlap between records from the two sources. However, the central and most of the boundary regions remain under‐sampled by either dataset. Both datasets negatively correlate with monthly flooded area extent, reflecting limited knowledge of avian diversity during flooding, when up to 80% of the Pantanal is submerged. Our results highlight that citizen science and biological collections can complement each other in capturing bird distribution, diversity and functional traits, which ultimately underpin ecosystem services at regional scales. Expanding similar integrative assessments across different ecoregions will improve biodiversity monitoring, refine conservation strategies and strengthen the value of citizen‐generated information in global ecological research.

Ibis
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Avian ecology and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon