Professional learning for in- and out-of-field mathematics teachers: participation, needs, and barriers

Out-of-field (OOF) mathematics teaching is a common phenomenon in many countries. While it may be a necessary response during times of teacher shortage, it has been associated with reduced teacher confidence and sense of professional identity. Professional learning (PL) is one means of improving OOF teachers’ knowledge and practice. Using an online survey we examine how OOF teachers’ (n = 97) PL needs and participation compare with in-field teachers’ (n = 120), from 48 government secondary schools in NSW, Australia. We found that OOF teachers expressed greater need, but participated less, in mathematics-related PL compared to their in-field teacher colleagues. We further found that OOF teachers with higher formal qualifications in mathematics participated in more PL than OOF teachers with lower mathematics backgrounds, and found it more helpful. Our findings reinforce the need to recognise the heterogeneity of OOF mathematics teachers, particularly regarding their mathematics qualifications, and for PL pathways to be created that accommodate their differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Professional Development in Education
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2026.2751217
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Professional learning for in- and out-of-field mathematics teachers: participation, needs, and barriers

Kathryn Holmes, Judy Anderson, Paul Richardson, Helen M. G. Watt
4 links
Professional Development in Education
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Professional learning for in- and out-of-field mathematics teachers: participation, needs, and barriers

Kathryn Holmes, Judy Anderson, Paul Richardson, Helen M. G. Watt
article en

Abstract

Out-of-field (OOF) mathematics teaching is a common phenomenon in many countries. While it may be a necessary response during times of teacher shortage, it has been associated with reduced teacher confidence and sense of professional identity. Professional learning (PL) is one means of improving OOF teachers’ knowledge and practice. Using an online survey we examine how OOF teachers’ (n = 97) PL needs and participation compare with in-field teachers’ (n = 120), from 48 government secondary schools in NSW, Australia. We found that OOF teachers expressed greater need, but participated less, in mathematics-related PL compared to their in-field teacher colleagues. We further found that OOF teachers with higher formal qualifications in mathematics participated in more PL than OOF teachers with lower mathematics backgrounds, and found it more helpful. Our findings reinforce the need to recognise the heterogeneity of OOF mathematics teachers, particularly regarding their mathematics qualifications, and for PL pathways to be created that accommodate their differences.

Professional Development in Education
The University of Sydney (AU), Monash University (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
NSW Department of Education
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Professional learning for in- and out-of-field mathematics teachers: participation, needs, and barriers — Kathryn Holmes, Judy Anderson, et al. · Professional Development in Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS