Surgical opportunities for primary prevention of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a procedure-level analysis of opportunistic salpingectomy

Abstract Background High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), the most common and lethal subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, is now recognized to originate predominantly from the distal fallopian tube. This paradigm shift has established opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) as a promising strategy for primary prevention during otherwise indicated abdominal or pelvic surgery. However, the frequency, timing, and surgical distribution of previous opportunities for OS among patients subsequently diagnosed with HGSOC remain insufficiently characterized. Objective To quantify previous surgical opportunities for OS before HGSOC diagnosis using complementary patient-level and procedure-level analyses. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed HGSOC who underwent primary debulking surgery or interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2016 and 2025. Clinicopathological characteristics, family and personal cancer history, germline genetic testing results, and previous abdominopelvic procedures were reviewed. A procedure was considered eligible for OS if it was elective, had been performed at least 12 months before HGSOC diagnosis, and occurred after completion of childbearing. Results Among 426 patients, 165 (38.7%) had undergone at least one previous abdominal or pelvic operation that fulfilled the predefined eligibility criteria for OS. At the procedure level, 210/469 previous operations (44.8%) represented potential opportunities for OS. Of these, 112/210 (53.3%) were sterilization procedures and 98/210 (46.7%) were non-sterilization procedures. Gynecologic surgery accounted for 135/210 (64.3%) eligible procedures, whereas 75/210 (35.7%) occurred during non-gynecologic surgery. Hysterectomy was the most common gynecologic procedure, and cholecystectomy was the most frequent non-gynecologic procedure. Eligible procedures were performed at a median age of 46.0 years (IQR, 40.0–53.0) and preceded HGSOC diagnosis by a mean interval of 17.9 years. Among 116 genetically tested patients meeting the OS-eligibility criteria, 32 (27.6%) carried a pathogenic germline variant. Conclusion More than one-third of patients with HGSOC had at least one previous surgical opportunity during which OS could have been considered, nearly two decades before HGSOC diagnosis. Although gynecologic surgery remains the principal setting for implementing OS, more than one-third of eligible procedures occurred during non-gynecologic surgery. These findings highlight repeated opportunities for OS across surgical specialties and support broader multidisciplinary implementation of OS for the primary prevention of HGSOC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ovarian Research
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-026-02332-2
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Surgical opportunities for primary prevention of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a procedure-level analysis of opportunistic salpingectomy

Cristina Taliento, Felix K. F. Kommoss, Cecilie Fredvik Torkildsen, Lisa Katharina Nees et al.
4 links
Journal of Ovarian Research
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Surgical opportunities for primary prevention of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a procedure-level analysis of opportunistic salpingectomy

Cristina Taliento, Felix K. F. Kommoss, Cecilie Fredvik Torkildsen, Lisa Katharina Nees, André Hennigs, Kathrin Haßdenteufel, Anna Sophie Scholz, Caroline Riedel, Christina Schmidt, Nourhan Hassan, Hannah Arndt, Helene Herrmann, Walid Shaalan, Oliver Zivanovic, Kyra Fischer, Fabian Riedel, Liat S. Matan, Friederike Stroisch, Maximilian Riedel, Christina Koehler, Michael Samuel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), the most common and lethal subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, is now recognized to originate predominantly from the distal fallopian tube. This paradigm shift has established opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) as a promising strategy for primary prevention during otherwise indicated abdominal or pelvic surgery. However, the frequency, timing, and surgical distribution of previous opportunities for OS among patients subsequently diagnosed with HGSOC remain insufficiently characterized. Objective To quantify previous surgical opportunities for OS before HGSOC diagnosis using complementary patient-level and procedure-level analyses. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed HGSOC who underwent primary debulking surgery or interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2016 and 2025. Clinicopathological characteristics, family and personal cancer history, germline genetic testing results, and previous abdominopelvic procedures were reviewed. A procedure was considered eligible for OS if it was elective, had been performed at least 12 months before HGSOC diagnosis, and occurred after completion of childbearing. Results Among 426 patients, 165 (38.7%) had undergone at least one previous abdominal or pelvic operation that fulfilled the predefined eligibility criteria for OS. At the procedure level, 210/469 previous operations (44.8%) represented potential opportunities for OS. Of these, 112/210 (53.3%) were sterilization procedures and 98/210 (46.7%) were non-sterilization procedures. Gynecologic surgery accounted for 135/210 (64.3%) eligible procedures, whereas 75/210 (35.7%) occurred during non-gynecologic surgery. Hysterectomy was the most common gynecologic procedure, and cholecystectomy was the most frequent non-gynecologic procedure. Eligible procedures were performed at a median age of 46.0 years (IQR, 40.0–53.0) and preceded HGSOC diagnosis by a mean interval of 17.9 years. Among 116 genetically tested patients meeting the OS-eligibility criteria, 32 (27.6%) carried a pathogenic germline variant. Conclusion More than one-third of patients with HGSOC had at least one previous surgical opportunity during which OS could have been considered, nearly two decades before HGSOC diagnosis. Although gynecologic surgery remains the principal setting for implementing OS, more than one-third of eligible procedures occurred during non-gynecologic surgery. These findings highlight repeated opportunities for OS across surgical specialties and support broader multidisciplinary implementation of OS for the primary prevention of HGSOC.

Journal of Ovarian Research
Cairo University (EG), University of Cologne (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), TUM Klinikum (DE), Frauenklinik Heidelberg (DE), University of Bergen (NO), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon