Toward system-of-systems resilience: a comparative framework for infrastructure interdependency assessment tools

Abstract Infrastructure systems are increasingly exposed to uncertainty, complexity, and rapid change. Natural hazards, accelerating technological development, and growing interdependencies among infrastructure sectors have made infrastructure failures more difficult to anticipate, model, and manage. While individual infrastructure systems are often well understood, their interactions, particularly the cascading failures and nonlinear dynamics that emerge during disruptions, remain poorly captured in practice. Many existing assessment approaches continue to treat infrastructures as largely independent systems, limiting their ability to support decision-making in environments characterized by emergence, surprise, and compounding risk. This paper addresses this gap by identifying, cataloging, and evaluating infrastructure interdependency assessment tools scoped to three sectors: energy, water, and transport. A structured, multi-stage process was used to compile a comprehensive inventory from peer-reviewed and gray literature. Tools were classified and evaluated using a dual framework that combines quantitative scoring of technical dimensions and qualitative assessment of categorical characteristics. The analysis identifies 24 tools within scope, of which only seven explicitly support system-of-systems interdependency assessment for the identified infrastructures. Results reveal an uneven tool landscape: dominance of sector-specific tools, strong emphasis on physical interdependencies, and limited integration of broader interdependency classifications. A fundamental tradeoff emerges between model complexity and practical usability, with no single tool capturing the full breadth of interdependency behavior. By providing a structured comparison and classification of available tools, this study offers guidance on tool selection and highlights key gaps in current modeling approaches, contributing to the advancement of infrastructure resilience assessment in complex, interdependent systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment Systems & Decisions
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-026-10162-2
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Toward system-of-systems resilience: a comparative framework for infrastructure interdependency assessment tools

Alysha M. Helmrich, Michael A. Deegan, Negin Shamsi
1 links
Environment Systems & Decisions
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
article

Toward system-of-systems resilience: a comparative framework for infrastructure interdependency assessment tools

Alysha M. Helmrich, Michael A. Deegan, Negin Shamsi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Infrastructure systems are increasingly exposed to uncertainty, complexity, and rapid change. Natural hazards, accelerating technological development, and growing interdependencies among infrastructure sectors have made infrastructure failures more difficult to anticipate, model, and manage. While individual infrastructure systems are often well understood, their interactions, particularly the cascading failures and nonlinear dynamics that emerge during disruptions, remain poorly captured in practice. Many existing assessment approaches continue to treat infrastructures as largely independent systems, limiting their ability to support decision-making in environments characterized by emergence, surprise, and compounding risk. This paper addresses this gap by identifying, cataloging, and evaluating infrastructure interdependency assessment tools scoped to three sectors: energy, water, and transport. A structured, multi-stage process was used to compile a comprehensive inventory from peer-reviewed and gray literature. Tools were classified and evaluated using a dual framework that combines quantitative scoring of technical dimensions and qualitative assessment of categorical characteristics. The analysis identifies 24 tools within scope, of which only seven explicitly support system-of-systems interdependency assessment for the identified infrastructures. Results reveal an uneven tool landscape: dominance of sector-specific tools, strong emphasis on physical interdependencies, and limited integration of broader interdependency classifications. A fundamental tradeoff emerges between model complexity and practical usability, with no single tool capturing the full breadth of interdependency behavior. By providing a structured comparison and classification of available tools, this study offers guidance on tool selection and highlights key gaps in current modeling approaches, contributing to the advancement of infrastructure resilience assessment in complex, interdependent systems.

Environment Systems & DecisionsVol. 47(1)
United States Army Corps of Engineers (US), University of Georgia (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon