Perceived and anticipated health system challenges to the implementation of effective case management in oncology palliative care in Iran: a qualitative study with Delphi expert consensus

Case management improves outcomes in palliative care for cancer patients; however, its implementation remains limited globally, and specific barriers hinder its adoption. Therefore, this study aims to identify perceived barriers and assess their importance and scientific acceptability through Delphi expert consensus. This multi-method study was conducted in Iran. The qualitative phase employed conventional content analysis of semi-structured interviews with 23 policymakers and healthcare providers selected through purposeful sampling. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis of Graneheim and Lundman, and the Rigor of the data was evaluated using Lincoln & Guba criteria. The subsequent Delphi phase involved a panel of experts across four rounds to assess the importance and scientific acceptability of the identified barriers. The analysis revealed two main barrier categories: structural (6 categories) and process (4 categories). Structural barriers included a weak referral system, coordination challenges across settings, restricted patient records access, resource constraints, policymakers’ and providers’ resistance, and paternalistic healthcare culture. Process barriers encompassed interprofessional collaboration challenges, role ambiguity in case management, focus of palliative care on end-of-life care, and weakness in shared decision-making. All ten barriers met the predefined consensus criteria across four Delphi rounds, with no items eliminated; consensus was defined as a mean score ≥ 70% of the maximum score and SD ≤ 1.0. This study presents an expert consensus framework of multilevel barriers requiring attention to policymaking, infrastructure, and cultural factors, providing an evidence-based foundation for developing contextually appropriate case management models that can improve palliative care delivery for cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02420-6
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Perceived and anticipated health system challenges to the implementation of effective case management in oncology palliative care in Iran: a qualitative study with Delphi expert consensus

Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari, Vahid Zamanzadeh, Maryam Rassouli, Leila Valizadeh et al.
3 links
BMC Palliative Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Perceived and anticipated health system challenges to the implementation of effective case management in oncology palliative care in Iran: a qualitative study with Delphi expert consensus

Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari, Vahid Zamanzadeh, Maryam Rassouli, Leila Valizadeh, Shima Yadegar Tirandaz
article en

Abstract

Case management improves outcomes in palliative care for cancer patients; however, its implementation remains limited globally, and specific barriers hinder its adoption. Therefore, this study aims to identify perceived barriers and assess their importance and scientific acceptability through Delphi expert consensus. This multi-method study was conducted in Iran. The qualitative phase employed conventional content analysis of semi-structured interviews with 23 policymakers and healthcare providers selected through purposeful sampling. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis of Graneheim and Lundman, and the Rigor of the data was evaluated using Lincoln & Guba criteria. The subsequent Delphi phase involved a panel of experts across four rounds to assess the importance and scientific acceptability of the identified barriers. The analysis revealed two main barrier categories: structural (6 categories) and process (4 categories). Structural barriers included a weak referral system, coordination challenges across settings, restricted patient records access, resource constraints, policymakers’ and providers’ resistance, and paternalistic healthcare culture. Process barriers encompassed interprofessional collaboration challenges, role ambiguity in case management, focus of palliative care on end-of-life care, and weakness in shared decision-making. All ten barriers met the predefined consensus criteria across four Delphi rounds, with no items eliminated; consensus was defined as a mean score ≥ 70% of the maximum score and SD ≤ 1.0. This study presents an expert consensus framework of multilevel barriers requiring attention to policymaking, infrastructure, and cultural factors, providing an evidence-based foundation for developing contextually appropriate case management models that can improve palliative care delivery for cancer patients.

BMC Palliative Care
University of Nizwa (OM), Shahid Beheshti University (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon