Failure to meet its stated objectives: a critical analysis of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

This legislative note critically examines whether the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS) achieves its stated objectives. The two objectives identified by analysing the Statement of Objects and Reasons are: (i) reducing delays in the criminal justice system; and (ii) making criminal procedure citizen-centric. This note argues that the BNSS fails on both fronts. First, it argues that the BNSS is incapable of reducing delays, as delays stem primarily from structural, systemic and infrastructural deficiencies within the police, prosecution and judiciary. Even the changes introduced, like limiting adjournments, incorporating technology and imposing procedural timelines, will remain ineffective unless these underlying issues are addressed. Second, the note contends that the BNSS does not make criminal procedure citizen-centric, as it fails to enhance the rights of key stakeholders. Instead, the BNSS weakens protections for the accused and makes it more difficult for victims from marginalized backgrounds to initiate the criminal justice process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Law Review
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2026.2758052
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Failure to meet its stated objectives: a critical analysis of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

Shagun Bhargava
Indian Law Review
Criminal Law and Policy
article

Failure to meet its stated objectives: a critical analysis of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

Shagun Bhargava
article en

Abstract

This legislative note critically examines whether the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS) achieves its stated objectives. The two objectives identified by analysing the Statement of Objects and Reasons are: (i) reducing delays in the criminal justice system; and (ii) making criminal procedure citizen-centric. This note argues that the BNSS fails on both fronts. First, it argues that the BNSS is incapable of reducing delays, as delays stem primarily from structural, systemic and infrastructural deficiencies within the police, prosecution and judiciary. Even the changes introduced, like limiting adjournments, incorporating technology and imposing procedural timelines, will remain ineffective unless these underlying issues are addressed. Second, the note contends that the BNSS does not make criminal procedure citizen-centric, as it fails to enhance the rights of key stakeholders. Instead, the BNSS weakens protections for the accused and makes it more difficult for victims from marginalized backgrounds to initiate the criminal justice process.

Indian Law Review
BML Munjal University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Criminal Law and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Failure to meet its stated objectives: a critical analysis of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 — Shagun Bhargava · Indian Law Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS