Legal Culture and Pandemic Management: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract This article compares the COVID-19 responses of four selected jurisdictions through the lens of legal culture. Legal culture is defined in this article as the interplay of legislation, the infrastructure and behaviour of legal institutions, and the behaviour and legal consciousness of the general population. The four jurisdictions are New Zealand, Taiwan, Germany and mainland China; they bear cross-cutting similarities and differences in terms of legal system, political system and cultural tradition. This article examines how legal culture was revealed in COVID responses and how it in turn shaped COVID responses. It illustrates the legal culture of the four jurisdictions as revealed through their respective pandemic responses. It argues that the three dimensions of legal culture interacted with each other to produce distinct pandemic responses; in other words, pandemic management is to some extent the product of legal culture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Jurist
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2026-0018
Primary Topic
Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Legal Culture and Pandemic Management: A Comparative Analysis

Ruiping Ye, Chien-Hung Liu
Global Jurist
Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
article

Legal Culture and Pandemic Management: A Comparative Analysis

Ruiping Ye, Chien-Hung Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article compares the COVID-19 responses of four selected jurisdictions through the lens of legal culture. Legal culture is defined in this article as the interplay of legislation, the infrastructure and behaviour of legal institutions, and the behaviour and legal consciousness of the general population. The four jurisdictions are New Zealand, Taiwan, Germany and mainland China; they bear cross-cutting similarities and differences in terms of legal system, political system and cultural tradition. This article examines how legal culture was revealed in COVID responses and how it in turn shaped COVID responses. It illustrates the legal culture of the four jurisdictions as revealed through their respective pandemic responses. It argues that the three dimensions of legal culture interacted with each other to produce distinct pandemic responses; in other words, pandemic management is to some extent the product of legal culture.

Global Jurist
National Chung Cheng University (TW), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Legal Culture and Pandemic Management: A Comparative Analysis — Ruiping Ye, Chien-Hung Liu · Global Jurist (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS