The First 200 Agents

Public research already counts how often enterprise AI agents fail. This paper looks at the problem from inside the build. It draws on 200 agents built between January 2024 and November 2026 for 13 organisations across the EMEA region and Central Asia, in financial services, telecom, shipping, manufacturing and healthcare, and in the author’s own practice. By November 2026, 188 remained in use; none of the 12 that ended failed technically. From these cases come three testable propositions: most of an agent is business logic, supported by a blind two-rater tally (kappa 0.81); without unit ownership an agent falls out of use; and people, not models, decide the economics. The paper turns the third into the Agent P&L, a per-task costing method with six cost lines, an exact-bound rule for earning less human review, and a test that separates cash savings from released staff time. It adds an agent ladder tying autonomy to the cost of an error, nine failure patterns, a two-track procedure for the next agent, and technical, contractual and governance appendices aligned with the EU AI Act and regional regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24038852
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The First 200 Agents

RAGHID W. CHARARA
4 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence Applications
article

The First 200 Agents

RAGHID W. CHARARA
article en

Abstract

Public research already counts how often enterprise AI agents fail. This paper looks at the problem from inside the build. It draws on 200 agents built between January 2024 and November 2026 for 13 organisations across the EMEA region and Central Asia, in financial services, telecom, shipping, manufacturing and healthcare, and in the author’s own practice. By November 2026, 188 remained in use; none of the 12 that ended failed technically. From these cases come three testable propositions: most of an agent is business logic, supported by a blind two-rater tally (kappa 0.81); without unit ownership an agent falls out of use; and people, not models, decide the economics. The paper turns the third into the Agent P&L, a per-task costing method with six cost lines, an exact-bound rule for earning less human review, and a test that separates cash savings from released staff time. It adds an agent ladder tying autonomy to the cost of an error, nine failure patterns, a two-track procedure for the next agent, and technical, contractual and governance appendices aligned with the EU AI Act and regional regulation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
INSEAD (FR), IE University (ES), INSEAD (AE), INSEAD (SG), Walsh College (US), American University of Beirut (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon