One Object: Hemispherical Asymmetry and the Low Multipoles in the Bounce Framework

Paper 3 of 3 in the CMB anomalies series. In the bounce framework the large-angle anomalies are faces of one object - an inherited axis, a founding profile, a founding sign, and a cut-born shear minority - and they stand or fall against one parameter set. This paper grades the faces not covered by Papers 1 and 2. Alignment: derived (the shared axis is the profile's identity), with the m-structure repair quantified in Paper 1. Low quadrupole (power ratio 0.215) and the odd-parity preference: constrained - the identification with the same founding profile is derived, while the signs and sizes await the marking law and the transfer. Hemispherical asymmetry: failed in full - the dipole-modulation axis sits at 91.12 degrees to the founding axis, and no reading of the profile produces its axis; the reopening condition is named (a derivation that determines the cut-born shear's azimuthal phase). Because the faces are projections of one object, the framework's exposure is joint: it can be falsified in one place, which is its answer to the a-posteriori debate. Deposited manuscript: register-corrected version (wording only; every number unchanged).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24039067
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

One Object: Hemispherical Asymmetry and the Low Multipoles in the Bounce Framework

William Alexander Aldred
6 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
preprint

One Object: Hemispherical Asymmetry and the Low Multipoles in the Bounce Framework

William Alexander Aldred
preprint en
6 citations

Abstract

Paper 3 of 3 in the CMB anomalies series. In the bounce framework the large-angle anomalies are faces of one object - an inherited axis, a founding profile, a founding sign, and a cut-born shear minority - and they stand or fall against one parameter set. This paper grades the faces not covered by Papers 1 and 2. Alignment: derived (the shared axis is the profile's identity), with the m-structure repair quantified in Paper 1. Low quadrupole (power ratio 0.215) and the odd-parity preference: constrained - the identification with the same founding profile is derived, while the signs and sizes await the marking law and the transfer. Hemispherical asymmetry: failed in full - the dipole-modulation axis sits at 91.12 degrees to the founding axis, and no reading of the profile produces its axis; the reopening condition is named (a derivation that determines the cut-born shear's azimuthal phase). Because the faces are projections of one object, the framework's exposure is joint: it can be falsified in one place, which is its answer to the a-posteriori debate. Deposited manuscript: register-corrected version (wording only; every number unchanged).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon