SAE Cooperation Theory Paper 1: Doing Together / SAE 合作论 Paper 1: 一起做

This paper reads what the cooperation this series speaks of looks like. This series does not define all cooperation; the cooperation it reads has as its premise that at least one party is headed in the 15DD direction, that is, that at least one party recognizes the other as an end too in this undertaking. This direction is a premise, not a component of cooperation, nor a sufficient condition for entering scope. 15DD and 14DD here are stances, not labels for persons; they are read by the current relational condition, not by persons; falling back is read as it occurs, and does not overturn the direction. Entering scope is checked on three further things: both avow this undertaking and actually take part, each having a share of his own; the other is not, in this undertaking, reduced to calculation; the arrangement the two jointly avow and maintain does not carry the direction of colonization toward a third person. Under this premise, the cooperation this series reads is this: two people, each for his own purpose, do together one thing that both avow and in which each has a share; neither party holds the purpose and adjudication of this undertaking alone, nor does it automatically produce, above the two, a "we" that legislates for both. Each one's share can consist in taking up his own part according to the other's arrangement; it can also consist in saying what he wants and deciding for himself how it is to be done. Merely having the qualification to refuse or to call a halt is not on that account having done a share; pausing the whole operation in order to correct the shared way of doing it can still be one's own share; only withdrawing one's own side, that of going on taking part, is read as exit. Direction, participation and judgment govern different things: for direction one party is enough; for participation both are needed; in judgment each party uses his own. The object layer and the operation layer are kept apart: each party can confirm only his own end, and does not declare on the other end's behalf that it avows. Three kinds are commonly met outside scope, and each is read differently: that in which neither party is headed in the 15DD direction, whose ideal type is the case in which both parties treat each other only as a strategy set and reach a balance by mutual calculation; that of being passively helped; that in which the arrangement the two jointly maintain carries the direction of colonization toward a third person. Where one end is headed in the 15DD direction and the other, in this undertaking, is reduced to calculation, another of the conditions of scope is not met; Paper 5 reads this. Collusion premised on "a third person is merely a means" decides who counts as an end by whether someone is one of our own; the recognition between the two does not rest on the other's being a person, and in this undertaking neither end is headed in the 15DD direction. In the prisoner's dilemma, the conclusion that both confess rests on given payoffs and choice assumptions; the computation does not take in the subject's examination of these premises, and the judgment this series asks after here falls on whether one recognizes the other prisoner as an end too. This paper interfaces with Hume, Rousseau, Hobbes and Axelrod. It does not prove that what others call cooperation is not cooperation, does not prove that cooperation in the 15DD direction is better than other cooperation, and does not prove that people ought to cooperate. 这一篇读这个系列所说的合作是什么样子。这个系列不给一切合作下定义;它读的合作,以至少一方在 15DD 方向上为前提,即至少一方在这件事上认对方也是目的。这个方向是前提,不是合作的组分,也不是入射程的充分条件。15DD、14DD 在这里是姿态,不是人的标签,按当前的关系条件读,不按人读;回落照读,不推翻方向。入射程另核三件:两人都认下这件事、实际参与,各有自己的一份;对方在这件事上不是只剩算计;两人共同认下并维持的那项安排,不朝第三人带殖民方向。 在这个前提下,这个系列读的合作是这样:两个人各为各的目的,一起做一件两人都认下、各有一份的事;这件事不由任何一方独占其目的与裁断,也不自动在两人之上生出一个替两人立法的「我们」。各人那一份,可以是照对方的安排做起自己那一部分,也可以是说出自己要什么、在怎么做上自己拿主意。仅有拒绝或叫停的资格,不因此已做了一份;为修正共同的做法而暂停整个操作,可以仍是自己那一份,收回自己继续参与的那一侧,才按退出读。方向、参与、判断三样管的不同:方向一方就够,参与两方都要,判断两方各用自己的。对象层与操作层分开:每一方只确认得了自己这一端,不替另一端宣布认下。 射程外常读到的有三种,读法各不相同:没有一方在 15DD 方向上的,其理想型是两方都只把对方当作一组策略、互相算计而达到平衡的;被动受助的;两人共同维持的安排朝第三人带殖民方向的。一端在 15DD 方向上、另一端在这件事上只剩算计的,不满足射程的另一件,第五篇读。以「第三人只是手段」为前提的合谋,按是不是自己人定谁算目的,两人之间的认凭的不是对方是一个人,在这件事上两端都不在 15DD 方向上。囚徒困境推出两人都认罪,凭的是给定的收益与选择假定;演算没有纳入主体对这些前提的审视,这个系列在这里追问的那一判,落在认不认另一个囚徒也是目的上。这一篇与休谟、卢梭、霍布斯、阿克塞尔罗德对接。它不证明别人说的合作都不是合作,不证明 15DD 方向的合作比别的合作好,也不证明人应当合作。