Controlled Evaluation of Gated Multimodal Fusion for Lie Detection Using Facial Motion and Speech Cues

Automatic lie detection from video requires combining weak behavioral cues under clip-level supervision. In gated multimodal models, the effects of modality-prior initialization and continuing regularization are difficult to distinguish without matched controls. This study evaluates a three-stream DOLOS pipeline combining static face crops, short-term optical flow, Wav2Vec2-base speech representations, and face-validity masks. Three gated logit-fusion conditions are compared: uniform initialization without regularization, directed initialization without regularization, and directed initialization with Prior-KL. Each condition is evaluated across three predefined splits and three random seeds. The directed-initialized Prior-KL model achieves 64.16 ± 4.56% AUC, 58.96 ± 4.16% balanced accuracy at the validation-selected threshold, 56.74 ± 10.67% lie-class F1, and 57.45 ± 5.15% macro-F1. Relative to the uniform-initialized control, the combined initialization-plus-KL configuration gains 2.26 percentage points in AUC and 2.29 points in macro-F1. With directed initialization held constant, adding KL yields higher lie-class F1 but no improvement in AUC or balanced accuracy. A matched seed-42 ablation finds that static facial appearance alone achieves higher AUC and balanced accuracy than the fused model, while fusion yields higher lie-class F1. These findings associate the observed mean AUC gain with directed initialization and show a class-specific trade-off from regularization. They also motivate identity-disjoint evaluation to assess the role of appearance-related shortcuts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Science and Technology Studies
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64539/msts.v2i2.2026.555
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Controlled Evaluation of Gated Multimodal Fusion for Lie Detection Using Facial Motion and Speech Cues

Anh Huy Phan
4 links
Methods in Science and Technology Studies
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Controlled Evaluation of Gated Multimodal Fusion for Lie Detection Using Facial Motion and Speech Cues

Anh Huy Phan
article en

Abstract

Automatic lie detection from video requires combining weak behavioral cues under clip-level supervision. In gated multimodal models, the effects of modality-prior initialization and continuing regularization are difficult to distinguish without matched controls. This study evaluates a three-stream DOLOS pipeline combining static face crops, short-term optical flow, Wav2Vec2-base speech representations, and face-validity masks. Three gated logit-fusion conditions are compared: uniform initialization without regularization, directed initialization without regularization, and directed initialization with Prior-KL. Each condition is evaluated across three predefined splits and three random seeds. The directed-initialized Prior-KL model achieves 64.16 ± 4.56% AUC, 58.96 ± 4.16% balanced accuracy at the validation-selected threshold, 56.74 ± 10.67% lie-class F1, and 57.45 ± 5.15% macro-F1. Relative to the uniform-initialized control, the combined initialization-plus-KL configuration gains 2.26 percentage points in AUC and 2.29 points in macro-F1. With directed initialization held constant, adding KL yields higher lie-class F1 but no improvement in AUC or balanced accuracy. A matched seed-42 ablation finds that static facial appearance alone achieves higher AUC and balanced accuracy than the fused model, while fusion yields higher lie-class F1. These findings associate the observed mean AUC gain with directed initialization and show a class-specific trade-off from regularization. They also motivate identity-disjoint evaluation to assess the role of appearance-related shortcuts.

Methods in Science and Technology StudiesVol. 2(2)
Saigon University (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon