Independent Constraint-Feasibility and Penalty-Consistency Audits of 2023 and 2026 Building-Energy Research Records

This draft preprint presents an independent mathematical and documentary audit of two related but distinct building-energy research records: an unpublished 2023 research draft and a substantially revised 2026 journal publication by Le Quang Huy and Hoang Quynh Anh. For the 2023 record, exhaustive evaluation of the 5,184-design component catalog finds no design satisfying the reconstructed wall constraints. A small continuous feasible region nevertheless exists under the reported 140.53 m² area denominator. For the 2026 publication, the printed wall-thickness lower bounds imply a minimum wall-area numerator of 27,441,000 mm², exceeding the permitted 20,982,000 mm². Consequently, under the published numerical constants, the three wall constraints are jointly infeasible even over the unrestricted two-dimensional real domain. The printed CPSO candidate violates all three reconstructable wall constraints. A rounding-aware analysis of Table 14 identifies an inconsistency in run 1 between the reported objective decomposition and the jointly reconstructable penalty components, under explicitly stated rounding assumptions. Runs 2 and 3 remain conditionally compatible. The study distinguishes hard-constraint feasibility from convergence of a finite-weight penalty objective. Its contributions are case-specific mathematical proofs, numerical consistency checks, source reconciliation, and reproducible audit procedures. The audit does not reproduce the original ANN training, CPSO execution, or building-energy simulation. It makes no claims concerning physical building impossibility, implementation defects, authors' intentions, research misconduct, or algorithmic superiority. Supplementary materials document the bounded literature search, claim–evidence relationships, bibliographic references, and remaining limitations. The privately supplied 2023 research draft and third-party original research files are not included in this deposit. Publication status: Draft preprint, version v0.2.4-p1. Not peer reviewed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24041169
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Independent Constraint-Feasibility and Penalty-Consistency Audits of 2023 and 2026 Building-Energy Research Records

Henric T. Böhm
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
preprint

Independent Constraint-Feasibility and Penalty-Consistency Audits of 2023 and 2026 Building-Energy Research Records

Henric T. Böhm
preprint en

Abstract

This draft preprint presents an independent mathematical and documentary audit of two related but distinct building-energy research records: an unpublished 2023 research draft and a substantially revised 2026 journal publication by Le Quang Huy and Hoang Quynh Anh. For the 2023 record, exhaustive evaluation of the 5,184-design component catalog finds no design satisfying the reconstructed wall constraints. A small continuous feasible region nevertheless exists under the reported 140.53 m² area denominator. For the 2026 publication, the printed wall-thickness lower bounds imply a minimum wall-area numerator of 27,441,000 mm², exceeding the permitted 20,982,000 mm². Consequently, under the published numerical constants, the three wall constraints are jointly infeasible even over the unrestricted two-dimensional real domain. The printed CPSO candidate violates all three reconstructable wall constraints. A rounding-aware analysis of Table 14 identifies an inconsistency in run 1 between the reported objective decomposition and the jointly reconstructable penalty components, under explicitly stated rounding assumptions. Runs 2 and 3 remain conditionally compatible. The study distinguishes hard-constraint feasibility from convergence of a finite-weight penalty objective. Its contributions are case-specific mathematical proofs, numerical consistency checks, source reconciliation, and reproducible audit procedures. The audit does not reproduce the original ANN training, CPSO execution, or building-energy simulation. It makes no claims concerning physical building impossibility, implementation defects, authors' intentions, research misconduct, or algorithmic superiority. Supplementary materials document the bounded literature search, claim–evidence relationships, bibliographic references, and remaining limitations. The privately supplied 2023 research draft and third-party original research files are not included in this deposit. Publication status: Draft preprint, version v0.2.4-p1. Not peer reviewed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Independent Constraint-Feasibility and Penalty-Consistency Audits of 2023 and 2026 Building-Energy Research Records — Henric T. Böhm · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS