Recontextualising weight stigma: health sciences and fat studies in dialogue

Both obesity and weight stigma are recognised as public health problems warranting intervention. Within health sciences, weight stigma is typically framed as a by-product of rising obesity rates, caused by the stigmatising behaviours of individuals. Contrasting this individualised framing of the issue, fat studies scholars have elucidated the broader structural and historical roots of stigma relating to higher weight. This review offers a conceptual overview of weight stigma across health science and fat studies, first examining health science conceptualisations, and then synthesising genealogical fat studies scholarship that elucidates how the origins of weight stigma (oft termed anti-fat ideology) can be attributed to influences of race science, puritanism, misogyny, and commercial interests. Through this critical historical frame, weight stigma pre-dated, and even arguably influenced, the enshrinement of ‘obesity’ as a public health problem. Reflecting on this gap between health sciences and fat studies conceptualisations of weight stigma and its conceptual relationship to obesity, we discuss approaches toward a discrimination-focused approach to tackling weight stigma that supports anti-discrimination protections and critically examines the stigmatising dimensions of obesity prevention and treatment efforts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.136614
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Recontextualising weight stigma: health sciences and fat studies in dialogue

Benjamin Hawkins, Jean Adams, Natalie Egan
1 links
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Recontextualising weight stigma: health sciences and fat studies in dialogue

Benjamin Hawkins, Jean Adams, Natalie Egan
article en

Abstract

Both obesity and weight stigma are recognised as public health problems warranting intervention. Within health sciences, weight stigma is typically framed as a by-product of rising obesity rates, caused by the stigmatising behaviours of individuals. Contrasting this individualised framing of the issue, fat studies scholars have elucidated the broader structural and historical roots of stigma relating to higher weight. This review offers a conceptual overview of weight stigma across health science and fat studies, first examining health science conceptualisations, and then synthesising genealogical fat studies scholarship that elucidates how the origins of weight stigma (oft termed anti-fat ideology) can be attributed to influences of race science, puritanism, misogyny, and commercial interests. Through this critical historical frame, weight stigma pre-dated, and even arguably influenced, the enshrinement of ‘obesity’ as a public health problem. Reflecting on this gap between health sciences and fat studies conceptualisations of weight stigma and its conceptual relationship to obesity, we discuss approaches toward a discrimination-focused approach to tackling weight stigma that supports anti-discrimination protections and critically examines the stigmatising dimensions of obesity prevention and treatment efforts.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon