Emotion Scoring Profiles of Local Large Language Models on the GoEmotions Dataset

This study compares the emotion scores assigned by ten locally deployed large language models to English Reddit comments from the GoEmotions dataset. The models were run through Ollama in the same hardware environment, and recorded scores for 27 emotion categories and the neutral category were examined. Each model covered 987–2,493 distinct texts, corresponding to 3,857–9,681 annotation rows in the dataset. Scores were weighted by the number of rows containing each text, following the existing data loading procedure. The analysis covered category means, model profiles, emotion-group totals, score distributions, and correlations between category means across models. For llama2:7b, the mean scores for love, grief, and excitement were 0.528, 0.520, and 0.518, respectively. The highest mean neutral score was observed for olmo2:7b at 0.702. The median across the 28 category means was 0.343 for llama2:7b and 0.042 for gpt-oss:20b. The findings show that the models assigned different score levels to emotion categories within the examined records. The results describe scoring tendencies within the available records, taking differences in text coverage across models into account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Science
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.2067366
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Emotion Scoring Profiles of Local Large Language Models on the GoEmotions Dataset

Furkan Öztemız, Musa Beytekın
3 links
Computer Science
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Emotion Scoring Profiles of Local Large Language Models on the GoEmotions Dataset

Furkan Öztemız, Musa Beytekın
article en

Abstract

This study compares the emotion scores assigned by ten locally deployed large language models to English Reddit comments from the GoEmotions dataset. The models were run through Ollama in the same hardware environment, and recorded scores for 27 emotion categories and the neutral category were examined. Each model covered 987–2,493 distinct texts, corresponding to 3,857–9,681 annotation rows in the dataset. Scores were weighted by the number of rows containing each text, following the existing data loading procedure. The analysis covered category means, model profiles, emotion-group totals, score distributions, and correlations between category means across models. For llama2:7b, the mean scores for love, grief, and excitement were 0.528, 0.520, and 0.518, respectively. The highest mean neutral score was observed for olmo2:7b at 0.702. The median across the 28 category means was 0.343 for llama2:7b and 0.042 for gpt-oss:20b. The findings show that the models assigned different score levels to emotion categories within the examined records. The results describe scoring tendencies within the available records, taking differences in text coverage across models into account.

Computer Science(2026)
Inonu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon