Experimental verification of clinical dose and LET maps for LET-informed proton therapy

Abstract Objective: Linear energy transfer (LET)-informed proton therapy has the potential to improve biological treatment planning beyond the conventional, constant-RBE assumption. Its clinical translation, however, requires experimental tools capable of verifying spatially resolved dose and dose-averaged LET (LET D ) distributions under clinically relevant conditions. We recently introduced an optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) film-based detector system that simultaneously measures two-dimensional (2D) absorbed dose and LET D . This work provides a first assessment of the system for verifying dose and LET D distributions from clinical proton therapy plans. Approach: The system was tested at two proton therapy centers, ranging from simple uniform fields to more complex geometries, including Bragg curve measurements and a clinically realistic anthropomorphic head phantom treatment plan. Measured dose and LET D distributions were compared against commercial treatment planning system (TPS) calculations and, for selected fields, to external Monte Carlo particle transport simulations due to the absence of traceability of LET D . For non-uniform irradiations, agreement was assessed using gamma analysis with 3%/2 mm and 5%/2 mm criteria for dose and LET D , respectively. Main results: For uniform fields, measured dose and LET D distributions generally agreed with TPS and independent Monte Carlo simulations across a range of clinically relevant irradiation conditions. In the Bragg curve measurement, gamma pass rates were 96.6% for dose and 99.7% for LET D , with the largest dose discrepancy observed near the Bragg peak, consistent with a current over-correction of detector quenching in high-LET regions to be improved in future work. In the anthropomorphic phantom, gamma pass rates ranged from 75% to 100% for dose and from 45% to 95% for LET D , with a single layer showing a sub-50% pass rate for LET D . Failing regions were confined to high-dose superior layers for dose and distal-edge, high-LET regions for LET D . Significance: The presented results support the detector system’s use as an experimental benchmarking tool for TPS-calculated dose and LET D maps. Given this and the system’s ability to simultaneously measure 2D dose and LET D maps with high spatial resolution and minimal field perturbation, the system shows promise for future commissioning workflows for LET-informed proton therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aebf1d
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Experimental verification of clinical dose and LET maps for LET-informed proton therapy

Jeppe Brage Christensen, E.G. Yukihara, Michelle van Heerden, Liliana Stolarczyk et al.
1 links
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Experimental verification of clinical dose and LET maps for LET-informed proton therapy

Jeppe Brage Christensen, E.G. Yukihara, Michelle van Heerden, Liliana Stolarczyk, Artūrs Meijers, Niels Bassler, Michele Togno, Anne Vestergaard, Mads L. Jensen, Francesca Albertini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Linear energy transfer (LET)-informed proton therapy has the potential to improve biological treatment planning beyond the conventional, constant-RBE assumption. Its clinical translation, however, requires experimental tools capable of verifying spatially resolved dose and dose-averaged LET (LET D ) distributions under clinically relevant conditions. We recently introduced an optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) film-based detector system that simultaneously measures two-dimensional (2D) absorbed dose and LET D . This work provides a first assessment of the system for verifying dose and LET D distributions from clinical proton therapy plans. Approach: The system was tested at two proton therapy centers, ranging from simple uniform fields to more complex geometries, including Bragg curve measurements and a clinically realistic anthropomorphic head phantom treatment plan. Measured dose and LET D distributions were compared against commercial treatment planning system (TPS) calculations and, for selected fields, to external Monte Carlo particle transport simulations due to the absence of traceability of LET D . For non-uniform irradiations, agreement was assessed using gamma analysis with 3%/2 mm and 5%/2 mm criteria for dose and LET D , respectively. Main results: For uniform fields, measured dose and LET D distributions generally agreed with TPS and independent Monte Carlo simulations across a range of clinically relevant irradiation conditions. In the Bragg curve measurement, gamma pass rates were 96.6% for dose and 99.7% for LET D , with the largest dose discrepancy observed near the Bragg peak, consistent with a current over-correction of detector quenching in high-LET regions to be improved in future work. In the anthropomorphic phantom, gamma pass rates ranged from 75% to 100% for dose and from 45% to 95% for LET D , with a single layer showing a sub-50% pass rate for LET D . Failing regions were confined to high-dose superior layers for dose and distal-edge, high-LET regions for LET D . Significance: The presented results support the detector system’s use as an experimental benchmarking tool for TPS-calculated dose and LET D maps. Given this and the system’s ability to simultaneously measure 2D dose and LET D maps with high spatial resolution and minimal field perturbation, the system shows promise for future commissioning workflows for LET-informed proton therapy.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon