Impact of Dosage Modifications on Efficacy: Insights from Select Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Approved for Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations

PURPOSE: Dosage modifications, including dose interruptions and reductions, are commonly implemented to manage adverse reactions observed with oncology drugs. However, their impact on efficacy is not well understood. Here, we explored the impact of dosage modifications on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for four US FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. METHODS: We collected patient-level data from clinical trials supporting the original FDA approvals of afatinib, dacomitinib, mobocertinib, and osimertinib. We identified the daily dose received (DDR; a measure of the dosage received by a patient each day), dose interruptions and reductions over the treatment period. In this exploratory analysis, we used a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model to assess the impact of DDR on PFS and landmark time-fixed Cox models at 30, 60, and 90 days from treatment initiation to assess the impact of early dose interruptions and reductions on PFS and OS. RESULTS: While the impact of dose interruptions and reductions on the risk of death varied among the studied drugs, dose interruptions, such as interruptions for four or more consecutive days, were more often associated with a higher risk of progression or death than dose reductions. CONCLUSION: For the evaluated drugs as monotherapy in NSCLC with EGFR mutations, our analysis suggests that dose reductions might have a lower impact on efficacy than missing or interrupting treatment. Further studies are needed to evaluate other EGFR treatments, drug classes, and cancer types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-26-1022
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Impact of Dosage Modifications on Efficacy: Insights from Select Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Approved for Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations

Rajanikanth Madabushi, Yuan Li Shen, Anuradha Ramamoorthy, Santiago D. Carrasquilla et al.
2 links
Clinical Cancer Research
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Impact of Dosage Modifications on Efficacy: Insights from Select Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Approved for Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations

Rajanikanth Madabushi, Yuan Li Shen, Anuradha Ramamoorthy, Santiago D. Carrasquilla, Issam Zineh, Stacy Shifflett Shord, Elimika Pfuma Fletcher, Amal Ayyoub, Youwei Bi, Wenjuan Gu, Jiang Liu
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dosage modifications, including dose interruptions and reductions, are commonly implemented to manage adverse reactions observed with oncology drugs. However, their impact on efficacy is not well understood. Here, we explored the impact of dosage modifications on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for four US FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. METHODS: We collected patient-level data from clinical trials supporting the original FDA approvals of afatinib, dacomitinib, mobocertinib, and osimertinib. We identified the daily dose received (DDR; a measure of the dosage received by a patient each day), dose interruptions and reductions over the treatment period. In this exploratory analysis, we used a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model to assess the impact of DDR on PFS and landmark time-fixed Cox models at 30, 60, and 90 days from treatment initiation to assess the impact of early dose interruptions and reductions on PFS and OS. RESULTS: While the impact of dose interruptions and reductions on the risk of death varied among the studied drugs, dose interruptions, such as interruptions for four or more consecutive days, were more often associated with a higher risk of progression or death than dose reductions. CONCLUSION: For the evaluated drugs as monotherapy in NSCLC with EGFR mutations, our analysis suggests that dose reductions might have a lower impact on efficacy than missing or interrupting treatment. Further studies are needed to evaluate other EGFR treatments, drug classes, and cancer types.

Clinical Cancer Research
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon