Preliminary exploration of sequential DPL and CO2 laser versus CO2 laser monotherapy for the prophylactic management of early postoperative linear scars: A retrospective cohort study

Background and Objectives. Prophylactic management of early postoperative linear scars remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of sequential dye pulsed light (DPL) and fractional CO 2 laser (CO 2 laser) versus CO 2 laser monotherapy in the prevention of scar hypertrophy, and to explore potential simplified early interventions. Patients and Methods. In this exploratory retrospective study, 38 patients with early postoperative linear scars were enrolled. They were divided into a sequential DPL-CO 2 laser group and a CO 2 laser monotherapy group (19 patients each). All received six monthly prophylactic treatments. Efficacy was assessed by two independent surgeons using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Results. After six treatments, no statistically significant difference was detected in the total POSAS score between the two groups ( p = 0.988, mean difference = -0.26, 95% CI: -1.66 to 1.14). Similarly, no significant differences were found in the patient (PSAS) or observer (OSAS) component scores. However, compared to baseline, both groups showed significant improvement in several key scar parameters, including vascularization, thickness, color, stiffness, and irregularity. One case of transient reactive hyperplasia in the CO 2 group was resolved with conservative management. Conclusions. Both sequential DPL-CO 2 laser therapy and CO 2 laser monotherapy were associated with favorable clinical trajectories in early postoperative linear scars over 6 months. In this exploratory, underpowered retrospective cohort, no definitive comparative conclusions could be drawn between the two regimens. Spontaneous maturation likely contributed to these outcomes. The observed parallel trends generate a hypothesis requiring proper prospective randomized evaluation to determine the true utility of CO2 laser alone as a simplified early intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lasers in Medical Science
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-026-05081-2
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Preliminary exploration of sequential DPL and CO2 laser versus CO2 laser monotherapy for the prophylactic management of early postoperative linear scars: A retrospective cohort study

Xiuxia Wang, 俞舜, Lin Lü, Jun Yang et al.
1 links
Lasers in Medical Science
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

Preliminary exploration of sequential DPL and CO2 laser versus CO2 laser monotherapy for the prophylactic management of early postoperative linear scars: A retrospective cohort study

Xiuxia Wang, 俞舜, Lin Lü, Jun Yang, Jing Luo, Jingyan Huang
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives. Prophylactic management of early postoperative linear scars remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of sequential dye pulsed light (DPL) and fractional CO 2 laser (CO 2 laser) versus CO 2 laser monotherapy in the prevention of scar hypertrophy, and to explore potential simplified early interventions. Patients and Methods. In this exploratory retrospective study, 38 patients with early postoperative linear scars were enrolled. They were divided into a sequential DPL-CO 2 laser group and a CO 2 laser monotherapy group (19 patients each). All received six monthly prophylactic treatments. Efficacy was assessed by two independent surgeons using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Results. After six treatments, no statistically significant difference was detected in the total POSAS score between the two groups ( p = 0.988, mean difference = -0.26, 95% CI: -1.66 to 1.14). Similarly, no significant differences were found in the patient (PSAS) or observer (OSAS) component scores. However, compared to baseline, both groups showed significant improvement in several key scar parameters, including vascularization, thickness, color, stiffness, and irregularity. One case of transient reactive hyperplasia in the CO 2 group was resolved with conservative management. Conclusions. Both sequential DPL-CO 2 laser therapy and CO 2 laser monotherapy were associated with favorable clinical trajectories in early postoperative linear scars over 6 months. In this exploratory, underpowered retrospective cohort, no definitive comparative conclusions could be drawn between the two regimens. Spontaneous maturation likely contributed to these outcomes. The observed parallel trends generate a hypothesis requiring proper prospective randomized evaluation to determine the true utility of CO2 laser alone as a simplified early intervention.

Lasers in Medical ScienceVol. 41(1)
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (CN), Wuxi Fourth People's Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon