Multi-scenario and multi-temporal analysis of carbon storage evolution in waterfront spaces: an integrated assessment and zoning strategy for carbon management in the middle Yangtze region

Carbon storage, a key indicator of terrestrial sequestration, reflects land use impacts on ecological security and is fundamental to regional carbon management and climate change mitigation. To support basin-scale carbon management strategies, this study examines the middle Yangtze River urban agglomeration. We coupled PLUS and InVEST models to analyze historical (2000–2020) and simulate 2030 land use and carbon storage under three scenarios: Natural Development (NS), Ecological Protection (ES), and Urban Development (DS). Using a 1 km shoreline buffer grid and Getis-Ord Gi*, we identified carbon storage hotspot/coldspot changes. Multi-temporal raster analysis first revealed three key waterfront functional units: Stable Core, Continuously Degrading, and Policy Response Areas. Results showed: (1) During 2000–2020, built-up land expanded 61.79%, while cropland and forestland decreased 4.28% and 0.65%, causing ~17.27 Tg net carbon loss. Multi-scenario simulations indicated ES, by curbing built-up expansion and increasing forest/water cover, could sequester ~3.85 Tg more carbon than NS, whereas DS would exacerbate loss. (2) The three zones comprised: Stable Core Areas (27.50% of waterfront space) in western mountains and around Dongting Lake, as carbon-sink bases; Continuously Degrading Areas (0.28%) at urban fringes, indicating persistent sink loss; and Policy Response Areas (0.26%) near Zhelin Reservoir (Jiujiang) and along the Yichang–Jingzhou river section, offering the highest marginal benefits for ecological interventions. (3) Three key lever zones were identified—stable core areas (27.50% of waterfront space), continuously degrading areas (0.28%), and policy response areas (0.26%) and using a dual-indicator assessment framework, differentiated strategies for urban waterfront space management are proposed. This study provides a basis for basin ecological protection through “zoning, targeted measures, and coordinated governance”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Balance and Management
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-026-00538-x
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Multi-scenario and multi-temporal analysis of carbon storage evolution in waterfront spaces: an integrated assessment and zoning strategy for carbon management in the middle Yangtze region

Hong Xu, Li Zeng, Muran Cai, Minghui He
6 links
Carbon Balance and Management
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Multi-scenario and multi-temporal analysis of carbon storage evolution in waterfront spaces: an integrated assessment and zoning strategy for carbon management in the middle Yangtze region

Hong Xu, Li Zeng, Muran Cai, Minghui He
article en

Abstract

Carbon storage, a key indicator of terrestrial sequestration, reflects land use impacts on ecological security and is fundamental to regional carbon management and climate change mitigation. To support basin-scale carbon management strategies, this study examines the middle Yangtze River urban agglomeration. We coupled PLUS and InVEST models to analyze historical (2000–2020) and simulate 2030 land use and carbon storage under three scenarios: Natural Development (NS), Ecological Protection (ES), and Urban Development (DS). Using a 1 km shoreline buffer grid and Getis-Ord Gi*, we identified carbon storage hotspot/coldspot changes. Multi-temporal raster analysis first revealed three key waterfront functional units: Stable Core, Continuously Degrading, and Policy Response Areas. Results showed: (1) During 2000–2020, built-up land expanded 61.79%, while cropland and forestland decreased 4.28% and 0.65%, causing ~17.27 Tg net carbon loss. Multi-scenario simulations indicated ES, by curbing built-up expansion and increasing forest/water cover, could sequester ~3.85 Tg more carbon than NS, whereas DS would exacerbate loss. (2) The three zones comprised: Stable Core Areas (27.50% of waterfront space) in western mountains and around Dongting Lake, as carbon-sink bases; Continuously Degrading Areas (0.28%) at urban fringes, indicating persistent sink loss; and Policy Response Areas (0.26%) near Zhelin Reservoir (Jiujiang) and along the Yichang–Jingzhou river section, offering the highest marginal benefits for ecological interventions. (3) Three key lever zones were identified—stable core areas (27.50% of waterfront space), continuously degrading areas (0.28%), and policy response areas (0.26%) and using a dual-indicator assessment framework, differentiated strategies for urban waterfront space management are proposed. This study provides a basis for basin ecological protection through “zoning, targeted measures, and coordinated governance”.

Carbon Balance and Management
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (CN), Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities, Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon