Project READ (Responsible English Advocacy Development) Reaching Out to Scaffold Gaps Among Learners

This study examined Project READ (Responsible English Advocacy Development) as a reading intervention for struggling Grade 2–6 learners. It sought to describe learners’ reading performance and difficulties in word recognition, decoding, and reading comprehension; identify appropriate instructional approaches; and develop a reading intervention program. The research combined qualitative and quantitative methods and identified 68 struggling readers. The Philippine Informal Reading Inventory, a researcher-made questionnaire, observations, interviews, and focus group discussions formed part of the data-gathering procedures. Frequency counts, percentages, weighted means, and standard deviations were used to describe the findings. The reported reading inventories showed a reduction in non-readers from 16 before the intervention to 2 afterward, alongside movement toward instructional and independent reading levels. Teacher responses described the indicators for word recognition, decoding, and reading comprehension as highly observed. The study emphasized explicit instruction, modeling, supported practice, independent practice with feedback, and sustained cooperation between teachers and parents or guardians. Recommended activities included localized reading worksheets, regular reading remediation, home support, and face-to-face, telephone, or text-based follow-up. The proposed program organized these activities into pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation phases, including orientation, learner screening, scheduled reading activities, and post-test assessment. The study recommended continued reading remediation, stronger parental involvement, the development of learning materials, and replication with a larger sample. Despite existing school-based reading interventions, a significant research gap remains regarding the development and evaluation of structured, localized, and multi-component reading programs that simultaneously address word recognition, decoding, and reading comprehension among struggling elementary learners across multiple grade levels. Previous interventions often focus on isolated reading skills or short-term remediation, with limited attention to sustained home-school collaboration, localized learning materials, and systematic monitoring before, during, and after implementation. This gap provided the rationale for developing Project READ as a more comprehensive and context-responsive reading intervention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.67903/ijroms0602
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Project READ (Responsible English Advocacy Development) Reaching Out to Scaffold Gaps Among Learners

Jerrick C. Maderazo
International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary Studies
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Project READ (Responsible English Advocacy Development) Reaching Out to Scaffold Gaps Among Learners

Jerrick C. Maderazo
article en

Abstract

This study examined Project READ (Responsible English Advocacy Development) as a reading intervention for struggling Grade 2–6 learners. It sought to describe learners’ reading performance and difficulties in word recognition, decoding, and reading comprehension; identify appropriate instructional approaches; and develop a reading intervention program. The research combined qualitative and quantitative methods and identified 68 struggling readers. The Philippine Informal Reading Inventory, a researcher-made questionnaire, observations, interviews, and focus group discussions formed part of the data-gathering procedures. Frequency counts, percentages, weighted means, and standard deviations were used to describe the findings. The reported reading inventories showed a reduction in non-readers from 16 before the intervention to 2 afterward, alongside movement toward instructional and independent reading levels. Teacher responses described the indicators for word recognition, decoding, and reading comprehension as highly observed. The study emphasized explicit instruction, modeling, supported practice, independent practice with feedback, and sustained cooperation between teachers and parents or guardians. Recommended activities included localized reading worksheets, regular reading remediation, home support, and face-to-face, telephone, or text-based follow-up. The proposed program organized these activities into pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation phases, including orientation, learner screening, scheduled reading activities, and post-test assessment. The study recommended continued reading remediation, stronger parental involvement, the development of learning materials, and replication with a larger sample. Despite existing school-based reading interventions, a significant research gap remains regarding the development and evaluation of structured, localized, and multi-component reading programs that simultaneously address word recognition, decoding, and reading comprehension among struggling elementary learners across multiple grade levels. Previous interventions often focus on isolated reading skills or short-term remediation, with limited attention to sustained home-school collaboration, localized learning materials, and systematic monitoring before, during, and after implementation. This gap provided the rationale for developing Project READ as a more comprehensive and context-responsive reading intervention.

International Journal of Research on Multidisciplinary StudiesVol. 1(10)
Quality education, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon