Green and digital shipping corridors: AIS-informed infrastructure and operational coordination

Green and Digital Shipping Corridors (GDSCs) require coordinated investment in alternative-fuel and digital infrastructure to support maritime decarbonization. This study proposes an AIS-informed optimization framework for coordinated green and digital infrastructure planning in the Singapore–Japan (SG-JP) and Singapore–Australia (SG-AU) corridors. Historical 2021 Automatic Identification System data are reconstructed into end-to-end vessel trajectories and corridor networks, providing the basis for estimating fuel demand and Just-in-Time fuel-saving potential. A mixed-integer linear programming model jointly optimizes LNG bunkering deployment, interoperable digital infrastructure, and LNG/HFO fuel allocation while accounting for fuel, infrastructure, carbon-emission, and methane-emission costs. Results show that the SG-JP corridor exhibits a denser and more diversified network, whereas the SG-AU corridor is more dependent on Singapore as the dominant hub. Intermediate ports outside the officially designated GDSC contribute substantially to operational coordination in the SG-JP corridor, while restricting infrastructure deployment has only a limited impact on the Singapore-Australia corridor. Joint planning achieves lower total costs than separated planning and the single-infrastructure benchmarks, but produces slightly higher GHG emissions than separated planning. Comparisons across budget ceilings reveal differences in facility locations and composition, with no further cost reduction beyond an economic investment threshold. Sensitivity analyses show that fuel prices, methane slip, vessel tank capacity, and assumed LNG service availability influence the selected portfolios. The proposed framework provides a practical decision-support tool for planning economically efficient and operationally resilient GDSCs before implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2026.105372
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Green and digital shipping corridors: AIS-informed infrastructure and operational coordination

Kashin Sugishita, Son Canh Nguyen, Shinya Hanaoka, Ran Yan et al.
4 links
Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
article

Green and digital shipping corridors: AIS-informed infrastructure and operational coordination

Kashin Sugishita, Son Canh Nguyen, Shinya Hanaoka, Ran Yan, Yang Liu, Lei Liu, Kelvin Lee
article en

Abstract

Green and Digital Shipping Corridors (GDSCs) require coordinated investment in alternative-fuel and digital infrastructure to support maritime decarbonization. This study proposes an AIS-informed optimization framework for coordinated green and digital infrastructure planning in the Singapore–Japan (SG-JP) and Singapore–Australia (SG-AU) corridors. Historical 2021 Automatic Identification System data are reconstructed into end-to-end vessel trajectories and corridor networks, providing the basis for estimating fuel demand and Just-in-Time fuel-saving potential. A mixed-integer linear programming model jointly optimizes LNG bunkering deployment, interoperable digital infrastructure, and LNG/HFO fuel allocation while accounting for fuel, infrastructure, carbon-emission, and methane-emission costs. Results show that the SG-JP corridor exhibits a denser and more diversified network, whereas the SG-AU corridor is more dependent on Singapore as the dominant hub. Intermediate ports outside the officially designated GDSC contribute substantially to operational coordination in the SG-JP corridor, while restricting infrastructure deployment has only a limited impact on the Singapore-Australia corridor. Joint planning achieves lower total costs than separated planning and the single-infrastructure benchmarks, but produces slightly higher GHG emissions than separated planning. Comparisons across budget ceilings reveal differences in facility locations and composition, with no further cost reduction beyond an economic investment threshold. Sensitivity analyses show that fuel prices, methane slip, vessel tank capacity, and assumed LNG service availability influence the selected portfolios. The proposed framework provides a practical decision-support tool for planning economically efficient and operationally resilient GDSCs before implementation.

Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation ReviewVol. 218
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG), RMIT Vietnam (VN), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Institute of High Performance Computing (SG), Institute of Science Tokyo (JP)
Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon