Gender equality, law, and social norms in development

Development institutions are increasingly interested in the role of social norms. This article asks what that interest means for law’s role in gender equality. Using seven leading examples of social norms measures, I identify i. a tendency to use state law as a proxy for social norm change, despite conceptual confusion about why or how law should function in this way ii. a failure to adequately measure or analyse the role of contentious politics and collective action in fostering law reform and social norm change; and iii. a largely uncritical celebration of the private sector’s progressive role in shifting social norms and laws, even in the face of compelling counter-evidence. I then explore how social norms, governance standards, and laws were framed in a recent investigation into the World Bank International Finance Corporation’s role in child sexual abuse. I argue that social norms have become such a dominant concept in gender and development that they risk crowding out discussion of the governance standards and laws by which development actors can be held accountable. To avoid this, we need to hold on to the key role that law can play in allocating accountability for gendered injustice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oñati Socio-legal Series
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2647
Primary Topic
Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Gender equality, law, and social norms in development

Kate Bedford
2 links
Oñati Socio-legal Series
Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
article

Gender equality, law, and social norms in development

Kate Bedford
article en

Abstract

Development institutions are increasingly interested in the role of social norms. This article asks what that interest means for law’s role in gender equality. Using seven leading examples of social norms measures, I identify i. a tendency to use state law as a proxy for social norm change, despite conceptual confusion about why or how law should function in this way ii. a failure to adequately measure or analyse the role of contentious politics and collective action in fostering law reform and social norm change; and iii. a largely uncritical celebration of the private sector’s progressive role in shifting social norms and laws, even in the face of compelling counter-evidence. I then explore how social norms, governance standards, and laws were framed in a recent investigation into the World Bank International Finance Corporation’s role in child sexual abuse. I argue that social norms have become such a dominant concept in gender and development that they risk crowding out discussion of the governance standards and laws by which development actors can be held accountable. To avoid this, we need to hold on to the key role that law can play in allocating accountability for gendered injustice.

Oñati Socio-legal Series
University of Birmingham (GB)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon