On the Correspondence Between Output Limiting Backstepping and Higher-Order Control Barrier Functions

Output Limiting Backstepping (OLB) and Higher-Order Control Barrier Functions (HOCBFs) both protect constrained system outputs through recursive constructions. This paper investigates their mathematical relationship and identifies conditions under which they yield identical limiting control inputs. The OLB formulation considered here requires a strict-feedback structure, whereas HOCBFs apply to a broader class of systems. For systems admitting both methods, the analysis shows how the HOCBF recursion corresponds to OLB phase-plane boundaries and tracking errors. It further establishes how to choose the safety function and design gains so that both methods yield identical limiting control inputs for relative degrees two and three. Aircraft angle-of-attack protection simulations confirm the correspondence and show that neglecting actuator dynamics can cause oscillations or instability under aggressive protection settings. The resulting correspondence provides a physical interpretation of HOCBF design parameters through OLB phase-plane limits and can guide HOCBF design for systems to which both methods apply.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31224/8735
Primary Topic
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

On the Correspondence Between Output Limiting Backstepping and Higher-Order Control Barrier Functions

Johannes Autenrieb, Hangxu Li, Agnes Steinert
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
preprint

On the Correspondence Between Output Limiting Backstepping and Higher-Order Control Barrier Functions

Johannes Autenrieb, Hangxu Li, Agnes Steinert
preprint en

Abstract

Output Limiting Backstepping (OLB) and Higher-Order Control Barrier Functions (HOCBFs) both protect constrained system outputs through recursive constructions. This paper investigates their mathematical relationship and identifies conditions under which they yield identical limiting control inputs. The OLB formulation considered here requires a strict-feedback structure, whereas HOCBFs apply to a broader class of systems. For systems admitting both methods, the analysis shows how the HOCBF recursion corresponds to OLB phase-plane boundaries and tracking errors. It further establishes how to choose the safety function and design gains so that both methods yield identical limiting control inputs for relative degrees two and three. Aircraft angle-of-attack protection simulations confirm the correspondence and show that neglecting actuator dynamics can cause oscillations or instability under aggressive protection settings. The resulting correspondence provides a physical interpretation of HOCBF design parameters through OLB phase-plane limits and can guide HOCBF design for systems to which both methods apply.

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon