Differing Conceptions of Interpersonal and Intergroup Conflict Resolution Across the Lifespan

Conflicts between individuals and between groups are common across human relationships, making effective conflict resolution essential for flourishing societies. Yet, how conceptions of interpersonal and intergroup conflicts develop with age remains largely unexplored. We investigated perceptions of, expectations about, and responses to interpersonal and intergroup conflicts in children (N = 97, Mage = 7.54, 45% female, 41% White), adolescents (N = 180, Mage = 13.17, 43% female, 59% White), and adults (N = 201, Mage = 38.98, 54% female, 78% White) tested in 2023. Participants viewed transgressions with ambiguous perpetrator intent between an individual perpetrator and an individual victim (interpersonal) or between a group perpetrator and a group victim (intergroup). All participants perceived more negative intent and expected less forgiveness in intergroup conflicts than in interpersonal conflicts, while adolescents and adults also punished more, and adults additionally expected less trust and perceived greater transgression severity. Harsher perceptions and expectations in intergroup relative to interpersonal conflicts were explained by greater intentionality being attributed to group perpetrators than individual perpetrators. With age, children increasingly perceived more negative intent and expected less trust in intergroup conflicts, appearing increasingly adultlike. Findings demonstrate that, compared with interpersonal conflicts, harsher conceptions of intergroup conflicts emerge early in development and strengthen across the lifespan.Keywords: Conflict, conflict resolution, intergroup, interpersonal, social cognitive development

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qkncd_v1
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Differing Conceptions of Interpersonal and Intergroup Conflict Resolution Across the Lifespan

Katherine McAuliffe, Jacob Glassman
PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Social and Intergroup Psychology
preprint

Differing Conceptions of Interpersonal and Intergroup Conflict Resolution Across the Lifespan

Katherine McAuliffe, Jacob Glassman
preprint en

Abstract

Conflicts between individuals and between groups are common across human relationships, making effective conflict resolution essential for flourishing societies. Yet, how conceptions of interpersonal and intergroup conflicts develop with age remains largely unexplored. We investigated perceptions of, expectations about, and responses to interpersonal and intergroup conflicts in children (N = 97, Mage = 7.54, 45% female, 41% White), adolescents (N = 180, Mage = 13.17, 43% female, 59% White), and adults (N = 201, Mage = 38.98, 54% female, 78% White) tested in 2023. Participants viewed transgressions with ambiguous perpetrator intent between an individual perpetrator and an individual victim (interpersonal) or between a group perpetrator and a group victim (intergroup). All participants perceived more negative intent and expected less forgiveness in intergroup conflicts than in interpersonal conflicts, while adolescents and adults also punished more, and adults additionally expected less trust and perceived greater transgression severity. Harsher perceptions and expectations in intergroup relative to interpersonal conflicts were explained by greater intentionality being attributed to group perpetrators than individual perpetrators. With age, children increasingly perceived more negative intent and expected less trust in intergroup conflicts, appearing increasingly adultlike. Findings demonstrate that, compared with interpersonal conflicts, harsher conceptions of intergroup conflicts emerge early in development and strengthen across the lifespan.Keywords: Conflict, conflict resolution, intergroup, interpersonal, social cognitive development

PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon