New development: Managing hybrid co-production with non-profit organizations—when distance helps and presence still matters

IMPACTPublic managers and non-profit practitioners increasingly need to organize co-produced services through a mix of physical meetings, online interactions and asynchronous document work. Based on a case of municipal social services in Italy, this article offers practical guidance for deciding when distance adds value and when it risks weakening co-production. The authors suggest that hybrid co-production should be designed by distinguishing activities that can be organized at a distance, such as co-ordination, reporting, monitoring and document work, from those that require presence, especially relational, sensitive, conflictual and user-facing activities. The article also highlights the managerial safeguards needed for hybrid arrangements: explicit responsibility for shared work, task-specific facilitation, document governance, differentiated communication and capacity support for smaller non-profit organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Money & Management
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2026.2747848
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

New development: Managing hybrid co-production with non-profit organizations—when distance helps and presence still matters

Pasquale Ruggiero, Gaetano Saporito, Leonardo Ioannucci
2 links
Public Money & Management
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

New development: Managing hybrid co-production with non-profit organizations—when distance helps and presence still matters

Pasquale Ruggiero, Gaetano Saporito, Leonardo Ioannucci
article en

Abstract

IMPACTPublic managers and non-profit practitioners increasingly need to organize co-produced services through a mix of physical meetings, online interactions and asynchronous document work. Based on a case of municipal social services in Italy, this article offers practical guidance for deciding when distance adds value and when it risks weakening co-production. The authors suggest that hybrid co-production should be designed by distinguishing activities that can be organized at a distance, such as co-ordination, reporting, monitoring and document work, from those that require presence, especially relational, sensitive, conflictual and user-facing activities. The article also highlights the managerial safeguards needed for hybrid arrangements: explicit responsibility for shared work, task-specific facilitation, document governance, differentiated communication and capacity support for smaller non-profit organizations.

Public Money & Management
University of Siena (IT), University of L'Aquila (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon