Computer-assisted Taylor spatial frame for correcting malalignment after unilateral external fixation of tibial fractures

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of computer-assisted Taylor spatial frame (TSF) for correcting malalignment after unilateral external fixation (UEF) of tibial fractures. This retrospective cohort study included 18 patients with tibial misalignment after UEF between February 2019 and February 2024. Using the TSF technique, X-ray parameters (deformity, frame, and mounting) were entered into software to generate a six-axis correction prescription. Reduction time, number of X-ray exposures, total external fixation duration, clinical fracture healing time, complications, and functional recovery were recorded. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare preoperative and final visual analogue scale (VAS) scores because the paired differences were not normally distributed; data are presented as mean (range) or median (interquartile range [IQR]). All 18 patients were followed up for a mean of 14.9 months (range: 12-18 months). Satisfactory reduction was achieved in all cases after TSF adjustment. Mean reduction time was 19.0 minutes (range, 15-24 minutes), and patients received a mean of 1.4 X-ray exposures (range, 1-3). Clinical fracture healing occurred after a mean of 24.0 weeks (range, 21-29 weeks), and total external fixation lasted a mean of 25.2 weeks (range, 22-30 weeks). Johner-Wruhs ratings at final follow-up were excellent in 15 patients and good in 3 (100% excellent/good). Median VAS scores improved from 7 (IQR, 6-8) before surgery to 1 (IQR, 0-2) at final follow-up (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Z = -3.77, P < .001). Superficial pin tract infections developed in 3 patients (16.7%; 3/18) and were controlled with oral antibiotics and dressing changes. No patient had deep infection, pin loosening, nonunion, or bone exposure. In this small, single-arm retrospective cohort, all 18 patients achieved satisfactory reduction with computer-assisted TSF, and adjustment times were short. No patient underwent secondary open reduction or fixation. These preliminary findings suggest that TSF may serve as a feasible minimally invasive option for correcting early malalignment following UEF of tibial fractures; however, multicenter controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000051508
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Computer-assisted Taylor spatial frame for correcting malalignment after unilateral external fixation of tibial fractures

Chengkuo Cai, Guoqi Ji, Zhiming Zhao, Weiguo Xu
Medicine
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Computer-assisted Taylor spatial frame for correcting malalignment after unilateral external fixation of tibial fractures

Chengkuo Cai, Guoqi Ji, Zhiming Zhao, Weiguo Xu
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of computer-assisted Taylor spatial frame (TSF) for correcting malalignment after unilateral external fixation (UEF) of tibial fractures. This retrospective cohort study included 18 patients with tibial misalignment after UEF between February 2019 and February 2024. Using the TSF technique, X-ray parameters (deformity, frame, and mounting) were entered into software to generate a six-axis correction prescription. Reduction time, number of X-ray exposures, total external fixation duration, clinical fracture healing time, complications, and functional recovery were recorded. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare preoperative and final visual analogue scale (VAS) scores because the paired differences were not normally distributed; data are presented as mean (range) or median (interquartile range [IQR]). All 18 patients were followed up for a mean of 14.9 months (range: 12-18 months). Satisfactory reduction was achieved in all cases after TSF adjustment. Mean reduction time was 19.0 minutes (range, 15-24 minutes), and patients received a mean of 1.4 X-ray exposures (range, 1-3). Clinical fracture healing occurred after a mean of 24.0 weeks (range, 21-29 weeks), and total external fixation lasted a mean of 25.2 weeks (range, 22-30 weeks). Johner-Wruhs ratings at final follow-up were excellent in 15 patients and good in 3 (100% excellent/good). Median VAS scores improved from 7 (IQR, 6-8) before surgery to 1 (IQR, 0-2) at final follow-up (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Z = -3.77, P < .001). Superficial pin tract infections developed in 3 patients (16.7%; 3/18) and were controlled with oral antibiotics and dressing changes. No patient had deep infection, pin loosening, nonunion, or bone exposure. In this small, single-arm retrospective cohort, all 18 patients achieved satisfactory reduction with computer-assisted TSF, and adjustment times were short. No patient underwent secondary open reduction or fixation. These preliminary findings suggest that TSF may serve as a feasible minimally invasive option for correcting early malalignment following UEF of tibial fractures; however, multicenter controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.

MedicineVol. 105(45)
Tianjin University (CN), Tianjin Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon