Supporting the Uptake of Evidence‐Based Care for Degenerative Meniscal Tears and Early Knee Osteoarthritis: A Collaborative Approach to the Development of an Intervention Using Stakeholder Perspectives and Integrating Behaviour Change Theory

BACKGROUND: Management of a degenerative meniscal tear (DMT) or symptoms consistent with early knee osteoarthritis (OA) frequently deviates from international clinical practice guidelines, which recommend education and exercise as first-line treatments and strongly advise against arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. There is a need for implementation strategies to support the uptake of evidence-based care. METHODS: A systematic, four-step intervention development process was used to guide development of a multi-faceted implementation intervention targeting both individuals with a DMT or early knee OA and their general practitioners (GPs). The process integrated behavioural theory, stakeholder perspectives and evidence on intervention effectiveness. Target behaviours were identified through a literature review and stakeholder consultation. Previously conducted qualitative interviews with 17 GPs and 11 people with DMT were re-analysed and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify behavioural barriers and enablers to the targeted behaviours. Behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and intervention components were then selected to address these determinants. Stakeholder input was incorporated to enhance acceptability and feasibility. RESULTS: The resulting intervention aims to promote guideline-concordant management of a DMT and early knee OA. A programme theory to guide implementation was developed to describe hypothesised mechanisms of action, and candidate outcome measures were identified to support future evaluation and assess the mediating mechanisms of behaviour change. CONCLUSION: Using a systematic, theory-informed and stakeholder-engaged approach, we developed a multi-faceted intervention to support delivery and uptake of evidence-based care for DMT and early knee OA. The intervention comprised GP educational workshops and resources to support an 'enhanced consultation', alongside referral to an early 'best practice' physiotherapy session. Patients received both components. The intervention was designed to be feasible, acceptable and locally relevant, but requires further testing to assess implementation and potential for scale-up in clinical practice. LIVED EXPERIENCE OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Stakeholder contributions played a central role in this study. People with lived experience of degenerative meniscal tears and/or knee OA (n = 6) and healthcare professional stakeholders (n = 15) were consulted during group discussions and individual meetings. Stakeholders informed every step of the development process, aiming to ensure the final intervention was feasible, acceptable and adapted to the local context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70940
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Supporting the Uptake of Evidence‐Based Care for Degenerative Meniscal Tears and Early Knee Osteoarthritis: A Collaborative Approach to the Development of an Intervention Using Stakeholder Perspectives and Integrating Behaviour Change Theory

Helen French, Clodagh Toomey, Elaine C. Toomey, Karen M. McCreesh et al.
Health Expectations
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Supporting the Uptake of Evidence‐Based Care for Degenerative Meniscal Tears and Early Knee Osteoarthritis: A Collaborative Approach to the Development of an Intervention Using Stakeholder Perspectives and Integrating Behaviour Change Theory

Helen French, Clodagh Toomey, Elaine C. Toomey, Karen M. McCreesh, Liam George Glynn, Helen O’Leary, Liam G Ryan, Katie Robinson, Hazel J. Jenkins
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of a degenerative meniscal tear (DMT) or symptoms consistent with early knee osteoarthritis (OA) frequently deviates from international clinical practice guidelines, which recommend education and exercise as first-line treatments and strongly advise against arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. There is a need for implementation strategies to support the uptake of evidence-based care. METHODS: A systematic, four-step intervention development process was used to guide development of a multi-faceted implementation intervention targeting both individuals with a DMT or early knee OA and their general practitioners (GPs). The process integrated behavioural theory, stakeholder perspectives and evidence on intervention effectiveness. Target behaviours were identified through a literature review and stakeholder consultation. Previously conducted qualitative interviews with 17 GPs and 11 people with DMT were re-analysed and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify behavioural barriers and enablers to the targeted behaviours. Behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and intervention components were then selected to address these determinants. Stakeholder input was incorporated to enhance acceptability and feasibility. RESULTS: The resulting intervention aims to promote guideline-concordant management of a DMT and early knee OA. A programme theory to guide implementation was developed to describe hypothesised mechanisms of action, and candidate outcome measures were identified to support future evaluation and assess the mediating mechanisms of behaviour change. CONCLUSION: Using a systematic, theory-informed and stakeholder-engaged approach, we developed a multi-faceted intervention to support delivery and uptake of evidence-based care for DMT and early knee OA. The intervention comprised GP educational workshops and resources to support an 'enhanced consultation', alongside referral to an early 'best practice' physiotherapy session. Patients received both components. The intervention was designed to be feasible, acceptable and locally relevant, but requires further testing to assess implementation and potential for scale-up in clinical practice. LIVED EXPERIENCE OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Stakeholder contributions played a central role in this study. People with lived experience of degenerative meniscal tears and/or knee OA (n = 6) and healthcare professional stakeholders (n = 15) were consulted during group discussions and individual meetings. Stakeholders informed every step of the development process, aiming to ensure the final intervention was feasible, acceptable and adapted to the local context.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(6)
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), University of Limerick (IE), University Hospital Kerry (IE), Macquarie University (AU)
Health Research Board
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon