Epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region: A descriptive analysis of stakeholder distribution, patterns, and regional variation

Epidemic and pandemic preparedness relies on multi-sectoral coordination, a competent workforce, and well-defined preparedness functions. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, preparedness is shaped by diverse health system capacities, political contexts and recurrent crises. Despite recurrent outbreaks in the region, limited regional-level evidence exists on who is involved in preparedness and how different roles are distributed across preparedness domains, as well as countries and income settings. This cross-sectional stakeholder mapping study identified stakeholder roles, affiliations, and organizations involved in epidemic and pandemic preparedness across 22 MENA countries. Using publicly available online sources, stakeholder roles were systematically identified and categorized according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) public health emergency preparedness framework. Records were analyzed by preparedness domain, workforce category, organizational affiliation, country, income level, and gender. A total of 3555 stakeholder roles were identified across the region. Roles were predominantly classified under coordination and communication (38.4%) and health services (32.0%), while emergency risk communication (4.1%) and policy development, adaptation, and implementation (6.6%) were the least represented domains. Emergency management roles constituted the largest workforce group (42.6%), followed by public health professionals (28.3%) and clinicians (19.4%). Significant variation was observed across country income levels, including differences in preparedness domains, workforce categories, organizational affiliation, and gender distribution. Records associated with women accounted for 31.5% of the total roles, with their representation varying across income groups. Preparedness-related roles were identified across the MENA region but vary in their distribution across domains, workforce categories, and countries. The greater representation of records in operational roles, alongside limited representation in policy development and emergency risk communication, highlights differences in the publicly identifiable preparedness landscape across functions. These findings provide a regional descriptive overview that can inform future validation, stakeholder engagement, and capacity-building efforts across the MENA region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007574
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region: A descriptive analysis of stakeholder distribution, patterns, and regional variation

Zeinab Awad, Zahraa M. Chamseddine, Nour Zaouk, Shadi S Saleh et al.
5 links
PLOS Global Public Health
Disaster Response and Management
article

Epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region: A descriptive analysis of stakeholder distribution, patterns, and regional variation

Zeinab Awad, Zahraa M. Chamseddine, Nour Zaouk, Shadi S Saleh, Reem Alaeddine, Zahi Abdul Sater
article en

Abstract

Epidemic and pandemic preparedness relies on multi-sectoral coordination, a competent workforce, and well-defined preparedness functions. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, preparedness is shaped by diverse health system capacities, political contexts and recurrent crises. Despite recurrent outbreaks in the region, limited regional-level evidence exists on who is involved in preparedness and how different roles are distributed across preparedness domains, as well as countries and income settings. This cross-sectional stakeholder mapping study identified stakeholder roles, affiliations, and organizations involved in epidemic and pandemic preparedness across 22 MENA countries. Using publicly available online sources, stakeholder roles were systematically identified and categorized according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) public health emergency preparedness framework. Records were analyzed by preparedness domain, workforce category, organizational affiliation, country, income level, and gender. A total of 3555 stakeholder roles were identified across the region. Roles were predominantly classified under coordination and communication (38.4%) and health services (32.0%), while emergency risk communication (4.1%) and policy development, adaptation, and implementation (6.6%) were the least represented domains. Emergency management roles constituted the largest workforce group (42.6%), followed by public health professionals (28.3%) and clinicians (19.4%). Significant variation was observed across country income levels, including differences in preparedness domains, workforce categories, organizational affiliation, and gender distribution. Records associated with women accounted for 31.5% of the total roles, with their representation varying across income groups. Preparedness-related roles were identified across the MENA region but vary in their distribution across domains, workforce categories, and countries. The greater representation of records in operational roles, alongside limited representation in policy development and emergency risk communication, highlights differences in the publicly identifiable preparedness landscape across functions. These findings provide a regional descriptive overview that can inform future validation, stakeholder engagement, and capacity-building efforts across the MENA region.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(11)
American University of Beirut (LB)
American University of Beirut, International Development Research Centre
Good health and well-being, Partnerships for the goals, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon