Improving Explosive Detection Dog Performance in Sealed Parcel Searches Through a Targeted Training Intervention

Explosive detection dogs are routinely deployed for parcel screening, yet realistic sealed-parcel searches may present challenges not captured by conventional odor-recognition training. In 2025, a black box study of ANSI/ASB Standard 092 identified substantially reduced detection of explosives in tape-sealed parcels, suggesting a potential training gap in this search scenario. This follow-on study evaluated whether brief, progressive training could improve dog performance in sealed-parcel searches. Thirteen operational dog teams participated in trials conducted in Lubbock, Texas, and Miami, Florida. Teams completed a baseline assessment using tape-sealed parcels containing 50 g of C4 or TNT, or distractors, followed by an odor recognition test (ORT) using controlled explosive odor presentations. Following the correction of identified odor-recognition deficiencies, teams completed a training intervention manipulating odor availability through variable parcel venting and requiring progression from odor-source recognition to trained final response. Performance was reassessed using the same parcel configuration. All teams detected C4 during the ORT, whereas only two teams detected TNT. Following intervention, overall sealed-parcel detection sensitivity increased by 35 percentage points (p = 0.0078). C4 detection increased from 38% to 69%, while TNT detection increased from 15% to 54%, although neither individual change reached statistical significance. The results demonstrate that odor recognition does not necessarily translate to effective source localization in sealed parcels and support progressive, operationally representative parcel-search training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16213513
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Improving Explosive Detection Dog Performance in Sealed Parcel Searches Through a Targeted Training Intervention

Lauryn E. DeGreeff, Paul C. Bunker, Paola A. Prada‐Tiedemann, Kathleen R. Sucher et al.
2 links
Animals
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
article

Improving Explosive Detection Dog Performance in Sealed Parcel Searches Through a Targeted Training Intervention

Lauryn E. DeGreeff, Paul C. Bunker, Paola A. Prada‐Tiedemann, Kathleen R. Sucher, Emma Calabrese
article en

Abstract

Explosive detection dogs are routinely deployed for parcel screening, yet realistic sealed-parcel searches may present challenges not captured by conventional odor-recognition training. In 2025, a black box study of ANSI/ASB Standard 092 identified substantially reduced detection of explosives in tape-sealed parcels, suggesting a potential training gap in this search scenario. This follow-on study evaluated whether brief, progressive training could improve dog performance in sealed-parcel searches. Thirteen operational dog teams participated in trials conducted in Lubbock, Texas, and Miami, Florida. Teams completed a baseline assessment using tape-sealed parcels containing 50 g of C4 or TNT, or distractors, followed by an odor recognition test (ORT) using controlled explosive odor presentations. Following the correction of identified odor-recognition deficiencies, teams completed a training intervention manipulating odor availability through variable parcel venting and requiring progression from odor-source recognition to trained final response. Performance was reassessed using the same parcel configuration. All teams detected C4 during the ORT, whereas only two teams detected TNT. Following intervention, overall sealed-parcel detection sensitivity increased by 35 percentage points (p = 0.0078). C4 detection increased from 38% to 69%, while TNT detection increased from 15% to 54%, although neither individual change reached statistical significance. The results demonstrate that odor recognition does not necessarily translate to effective source localization in sealed parcels and support progressive, operationally representative parcel-search training.

AnimalsVol. 16(21)
Texas Tech University (US), Florida International University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon