A method of dentoalveolar reconstruction using a manual non-impact mucotome-osteotome for harvesting a three-layer autograft from the maxillary tuberosity in immediate dental implant placement

Immediate implant placement after extraction of teeth lost due to complications of caries, traumatic cracks and fractures, or inflammatory periodontal disease is often associated with hard and soft tissue deficiency, which requires simultaneous dentoalveolar reconstruction. The choice of donor material and of a minimally traumatic harvesting technique remains a relevant problem in oral surgery. Objective. To improve the outcomes of immediate implant placement with dentoalveolar reconstruction by using a developed technique in which a three-layer bone—gingival autograft is harvested from the maxillary tuberosity with a manual non-impact mucotome-osteotome. Materials and methods. In 2024—2025, 104 patients aged 29—63 years underwent flapless immediate implant placement with simultaneous dentoalveolar reconstruction using an autograft from the maxillary tuberosity. In the study group (n=73), the three-layer bone—gingival autograft (triple graft) was harvested with the developed manual non-impact mucotome-osteotome; in the control group (n=31), it was harvested with a chisel and mallet. Buccal bone thickness (CBCT) and buccal mucosal thickness were measured immediately after surgery and at 6 months; donor-site pain was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) on days 1 and 3, and mucosal hyperaemia on days 1, 3 and 7. Welch’s t-test, the Mann—Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test were used for between-group comparisons; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. On day 3, donor-site pain was absent in 57 (78.1%) patients of the study group versus 5 (16.1%) patients of the control group (p≤0.001). Normal mucosal colour on day 3 was observed in 57.5% and 9.7% of patients, respectively (p≤0.001). On day 7, mild hyperaemia persisted in 5.5% of patients in the study group, whereas moderate hyperaemia persisted in 19.4% of controls (p=0.019). At 6 months, buccal bone thickness was 2.55+0.42 mm in the study group (2.68+0.37 mm at baseline) and 2.48+0.05 mm in the control group (2.71+0.03 mm at baseline; between-group difference not significant, p=0.17). Mucosal thickness increased from 1.08+0.02 to 1.65+0.01 mm in the study group and from 1.14+0.03 to 1.49+0.02 mm in the control group. Conclusion. Harvesting a three-layer autograft from the maxillary tuberosity with a manual non-impact mucotome-osteotome is associated with less donor-site pain and faster resolution of mucosal hyperaemia than chisel harvesting and allows simultaneous restoration of the hard and soft tissue components around immediately placed implants over a 6-month follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat202619032165
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A method of dentoalveolar reconstruction using a manual non-impact mucotome-osteotome for harvesting a three-layer autograft from the maxillary tuberosity in immediate dental implant placement

A. D. Semеnov, Innokenty D. Ushnitsky, P.A. Lazukin
1 links
Russian Journal of Stomatology
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

A method of dentoalveolar reconstruction using a manual non-impact mucotome-osteotome for harvesting a three-layer autograft from the maxillary tuberosity in immediate dental implant placement

A. D. Semеnov, Innokenty D. Ushnitsky, P.A. Lazukin
article en

Abstract

Immediate implant placement after extraction of teeth lost due to complications of caries, traumatic cracks and fractures, or inflammatory periodontal disease is often associated with hard and soft tissue deficiency, which requires simultaneous dentoalveolar reconstruction. The choice of donor material and of a minimally traumatic harvesting technique remains a relevant problem in oral surgery. Objective. To improve the outcomes of immediate implant placement with dentoalveolar reconstruction by using a developed technique in which a three-layer bone—gingival autograft is harvested from the maxillary tuberosity with a manual non-impact mucotome-osteotome. Materials and methods. In 2024—2025, 104 patients aged 29—63 years underwent flapless immediate implant placement with simultaneous dentoalveolar reconstruction using an autograft from the maxillary tuberosity. In the study group (n=73), the three-layer bone—gingival autograft (triple graft) was harvested with the developed manual non-impact mucotome-osteotome; in the control group (n=31), it was harvested with a chisel and mallet. Buccal bone thickness (CBCT) and buccal mucosal thickness were measured immediately after surgery and at 6 months; donor-site pain was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) on days 1 and 3, and mucosal hyperaemia on days 1, 3 and 7. Welch’s t-test, the Mann—Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test were used for between-group comparisons; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. On day 3, donor-site pain was absent in 57 (78.1%) patients of the study group versus 5 (16.1%) patients of the control group (p≤0.001). Normal mucosal colour on day 3 was observed in 57.5% and 9.7% of patients, respectively (p≤0.001). On day 7, mild hyperaemia persisted in 5.5% of patients in the study group, whereas moderate hyperaemia persisted in 19.4% of controls (p=0.019). At 6 months, buccal bone thickness was 2.55+0.42 mm in the study group (2.68+0.37 mm at baseline) and 2.48+0.05 mm in the control group (2.71+0.03 mm at baseline; between-group difference not significant, p=0.17). Mucosal thickness increased from 1.08+0.02 to 1.65+0.01 mm in the study group and from 1.14+0.03 to 1.49+0.02 mm in the control group. Conclusion. Harvesting a three-layer autograft from the maxillary tuberosity with a manual non-impact mucotome-osteotome is associated with less donor-site pain and faster resolution of mucosal hyperaemia than chisel harvesting and allows simultaneous restoration of the hard and soft tissue components around immediately placed implants over a 6-month follow-up.

Russian Journal of StomatologyVol. 19(3)
North-Eastern Federal University (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon