Možnosti a limity medzinárodného benchmarkingu výkonnosti verejnej správy: komparácia krajín V4

International assessments of public administration performance face challenges of conceptual and methodological comparability. This study identifies and classifies nine international assessment tools and examines their applicability to benchmarking Visegrad Four (V4) countries, particularly Slovakia. Using an exploratory-descriptive approach, it combines comparative content analysis, secondary quantitative analysis, and qualitative synthesis. The tools are classified into three groups based on their scope and methodological characteristics. Findings reveal differences in measured dimensions, data sources, and benchmarking potential. Slovakia’s BIPA score is comparable to those of Czechia and Poland, while its WGI Government Effectiveness score is lower. The study concludes that assessment tools are not interchangeable and that their combined use can provide a more comprehensive understanding of public administration performance, provided their methodological limitations are considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta aerarii publici.
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24040/aap.2026.23.2.42-60
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Možnosti a limity medzinárodného benchmarkingu výkonnosti verejnej správy: komparácia krajín V4

Beata Mikušová Meričková, Nikoleta Jakuš Muthová, Timotej Šagúl
Acta aerarii publici.
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Možnosti a limity medzinárodného benchmarkingu výkonnosti verejnej správy: komparácia krajín V4

Beata Mikušová Meričková, Nikoleta Jakuš Muthová, Timotej Šagúl
article en

Abstract

International assessments of public administration performance face challenges of conceptual and methodological comparability. This study identifies and classifies nine international assessment tools and examines their applicability to benchmarking Visegrad Four (V4) countries, particularly Slovakia. Using an exploratory-descriptive approach, it combines comparative content analysis, secondary quantitative analysis, and qualitative synthesis. The tools are classified into three groups based on their scope and methodological characteristics. Findings reveal differences in measured dimensions, data sources, and benchmarking potential. Slovakia’s BIPA score is comparable to those of Czechia and Poland, while its WGI Government Effectiveness score is lower. The study concludes that assessment tools are not interchangeable and that their combined use can provide a more comprehensive understanding of public administration performance, provided their methodological limitations are considered.

Acta aerarii publici.Vol. 23(2)
Matej Bel University (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon